I don't know if @Gigi was joking but clients should actually offer protection against that kind of stuff -- perhaps not explicitly, but by means of allowing advanced relay choice for each kind of action and circumstance.
Login to reply
Replies (7)
I appreciate the desire, but I do not see any path down that road that doesn't end up in Twitter Content Moderation team madness.
IMO, it's not just a technical thing.
Different communities become different.
IMO, we should remain irreverent, old-reddit style, while opposing the behavior of users like this, for instance.
people who use the word "cyberbullying" are exactly the target... best stick with painting.
"which i consider a happy place" - ahhhh okay sfw - welcome to REAL LIFE ?
There is no "we".
define better.
View quoted note →
> by means of allowing advanced relay choice for each kind of action and circumstance
“Advanced relay choice” is challenging to be in the domain of the majority of nostr enjoyers.
One obvious way this could be addressed are blocklists, but I can see that go *very* badly.
Another could be just being vile to the vile (this could also go sideways).
You have no idea if that is true.
Blocklists and client-side filtering cannot do what proper relay selection can, because bad users can still make you use all your bandwidth and CPU on their trash.
Even rate-limits are already a form of moderation, so there is no point to not do better than that, and custom.
most of the time even I can't tell whether I'm joking or not
I don't know if @Gigi was joking but clients should actually offer protection against that kind of stuff -- perhaps not explicitly, but by means of allowing advanced relay choice for each kind of action and circumstance.
View quoted note →