Reducing FUD and building on ECC is the way, thank you!
How could we even verify the claim of an attack? Literally every spend on Bitcoin looks like a valid spend, how does the community actually verify an attack?
There is an incentive to push this fud because it’s not falsifiable from on-chain data alone, it literally requires us to go to their domain of physics.
Seems to me in the Bitcoin vs Quantum standoff, both sides are pointing guns at each other but only one of the guns loaded.
The question really becomes, is Bitcoin empirical proof for the quantization of time? Is it enough to demand physics to abandon continuous time models?
If this is true, their models are broken.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
In Bitcoin there are no attacks, just valid transactions. Attacks are a social layer thing outside the scope of Bitcoin. Same with value, 1 sat is 1 sat. How it is actually valued is outside of Bitcoin.