@Jack Madison @PlebNick

@PlebNick @Jack Madison

GM, feeling extremely grateful.

It’s Bitcoin or Quantum. You cannot “double-spend” the ontology of time. One system demands time to be quantized, discrete and indivisible at a certain threshold. The other demands time to be continuous and infinitely divisible. One says time is just a coordinate and the other says time is a coordinate, a process and an object. One is proof, empirically and openly verifiable; the other is an assumed and unproven axiom that requires your trust. You must choose one. The time is coming to pick a side. Stop double spending, both cannot logically be true.

Here’s a very awesome discussion of Stephen Wolfram and Brian Greene talking about Bitcoin for over 2 hours, without either of them realizing they are talking about Bitcoin.

So what happens when we get hash rate to1.855094832 x 10^{43} hashes per second?

Unless you’re computing the work of each block then Bitcoin selects orphaned blocks by the longest chain of time, not the longest chain of work. We should not assume the longest chain of time is the longest chain of work. Once you integrate the second law into Bitcoin, the contents of the blocks are more important than block height of you are specifically talking in the domain of work.

GM, the quantum gravity paradox only exists under the false axiom that time is continuous. Bitcoin is the answer.

GM, the satoshi is actually the bit-coin, or value-bit. A satoshi is 1 singular bit of value.