Amy Klubuchar is another politician that appeared out of nowhere and became a senator. I wonder if a USAID NGO had anything to do with it?

I don't understand why they would be afraid. It's not like there's any historical repercussions for going along with the graft machine. I'm certainly not for the guillotine but I can't help it if the debts created by those who closed businesses, forced vaccinations, and used the Federal Government as their revenge machine and piggy bank are not fortunate enough to enjoy the jubilee. Just drive around Washington DC and look at the new mansions built in the last 4 years. How did those people get money for that? Is there some kind of manufacturing that is there that is booming other than consent? Probably a good time for many to come to Jesus.

They agreed to open up the books. The whole thing is just theatre.

drain the fuckin swamp

The should be. Disgusting

The rats are fleeing the sinking ship! It’s exciting to finally see both transparency on how our tax dollars are being spent and how actions can be taken to overcome the grift to control spending. But even with DOGE, fiscal dominance is unavoidable and sound money is imperative. Get off zero #bitcoin

The biggest problem we all have. That is giving the government your attention. Why not send them a message? Forget you have a constitution. Think, how is it I'm liable for their policies and their debts that they apply to us? Remember, you live in a country where consent matters. Rule by consent. Ask yourself, why is it by default I have to comply with someone else's rules? Surely, if someone else is applying rules to your property, they must be the property owner. How is it they can do this to us? If they have control over us, how was that done to us? I can tell you. We are the trustee and executor of thier account that we administer for them. We keep claiming property ownership as we are the trustee in the relationship. A couple of quotes from Romley Stuart, and these hit the spot: Q. "He who holds legal title cannot touch the equity without a licence." Q. 'The only way to confirm equitable title is to grant legal title. The one who accepts legal title accepts and confirms that the one granting it must have been the owner in the first place. The legal title becomes a written confirmation of equity." So, we are on the wrong side of the relationship. We are the slaves, the trustee. How do we become the beneficiary? Do we even want to be the beneficiary in their jurisdiction? I'd say no! But they have hold of the purse strings, the currency that we keep claiming over. What would happen if, in their jurisdiction, we gave back all their property, even all your fiat currency earnings? What would that make you in their jurisdiction? You see, most can't see the solution in front of their eyes. Give them what they want, give them the money. We'll take the equity. Remember, giving back all our property does not destroy the account. It only changes the equity relationship. This is securities 101 and is all laid out in the UCC articles. He who holds the certificate is the securities intermediary. Carryout, either verbally in front of a high court Judge or by paperwork the return of their property.

Once you see the light, you see the solution. It does mean you need to step up to the bullies and embrace your own liabilities.

This. View quoted note →

This.

It’s like they forgot who they’re supposed to be accountable to.