Well let me put it this way, if there is a secret rule book but none of the judges have to follow it then is there really a secret rule book? Can the “real” law even be the law if no one in authority is bound to follow it? But, presumably if the Court concluded that the filings were nonsense then that means they were reviewed. Filings often get reviewed and summarily denied if they make no sense. Motions get denied all the time for failure to do something as simple as certify that you conferred with the opposing party before filing it even if the motion’s argument is sound. If rejection/striking/dismissal of her filings was inappropriate then she can appeal those rulings. But if the appellate court is in on the conspiracy and the Supreme Court is in on the conspiracy, then is there really a secret book of laws in any meaningful sense or at all?