Let me assure you, I _have_ looked into it and they are just wrong. I’m trying to come up with better analogies but it’s sort of like if you tried to take all the conventions and syntax of one programming language and then insist on using them in a different programming language. You’ll be saying a lot of shit that would make sense elsewhere but not _here_. One example is trying to claim they are not “in commerce” so they dont need a drivers license by referring to a statute that exempts licensure for certain commercial drivers but thats an exemption for _that_ type of license for _that_ type of driver, those same people still have to get regular driver’s licenses. You see young lawyers do this too where they will take some phrase from a case and try to shoehorn it into a context where it doesn’t make sense because the words on their face sound right and you would love to hear the judge use them in your case but the context is completely wrong for it.