Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 43
Generated: 22:56:22
Login to reply

Replies (43)

Why? Whirlpool is intended to be decentralised. If no one single party is "running" all the mixes around the world, that can't possibly be seen as all of those nodes acting with malicious intent. The more Whirlpool coordinators, the better. I have the right to break connections between inputs and outputs for privacy reasons and not exposing my balances to my friends. There are other coordinators, use them, make more of them, make Sparrow a Whirlpool server instead.
2024-04-25 17:50:58 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
What's wrong with temporarily creating a multisig transaction with 4 other people, who you have no knowledge of? You're not intentionally assisting anyone with a crime - you don't even know who they are, or even where
2024-04-25 17:57:17 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
Isn't that the right angle nostr:npub18hqtw4vjsg6s0a0kyhugn5mt5fs8fp64pd8nsv66vqld5qg090pqe75kus? If I want to break the link between my balances and recipients, in good faith, I should be able to coordinate with those who want to do the same?
2024-04-25 18:07:42 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
"should be able" leaves out the important question: who makes that possible for you and what risk are they taking. You can do it yourself, compile code yourself, etc. You can also hope, but not demand, that someone else does that for you. But people offering such services have to make their own risk calculation. And that calculation changed a lot yesterday.
2024-04-25 18:19:52 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
Yes I can compile code myself, run the transactions myself with other people I know, but the best way for Bitcoin to operate is where inputs can't be connected directly to outputs, and that's just how Bitcoin works. Surely a block could possibly be made one giant transaction with every input and output in one go?
2024-04-25 18:40:31 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 2 replies ↓ Reply
Anonymity against a dedicated state actor is hard. And getting features built and merged without the benefit of in person meetings and conferences is a huge handicap. It's possible but there's a price. Bitcoin development is already slow, might slow down 10 - 100x if the current crop of devs is killed (or fakes disappearance somehow) and new nyms have to take over.
2024-04-25 21:23:13 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
There are no privacy benefits to signature aggregation. The public keys are still visible on the chain. It allows you to put slightly more transactions in a block, which may or may not actually make a difference for fees. And thanks for listening!
2024-04-26 07:47:21 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply