yeah not very convincing. it was the middle of the afternoon and a dozen structures. pretty clearly a "if they die, they die" attitude.
which is different than a mass shooting of course.
so maybe a "Unabomber for zoning conflicts"
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Well it's fine to disagree. But I think the attacks speak for themselves. Targeted buildings > destroyed buildings, sent bombs to people > blew people up. I think you can glean something about the intent from the action itself. If Uncle Ted said "I never meant to hurt anyone" that would be very hard to believe. If St Martin said "what I intended is what I did" that is very plausible.
whether the intent was to kill or not is kinda beside the point .
its just a immature reaction to small town politics.
there are seldom win-win situations in governance, somebody was going to get screwed and he wasn't part of the old boys club.
take the money and go somewhere else.