My Bitcoin Price Prediction model for the next 5 years Needless to say - not financial advice, no one knows what's going to happen, many assumptions are made. The model assumes a "contained Bitcoin" regime - paperized SoV, MoE throttled, volatility damped, price never too cheap (to avoid a self-custody revolt), never too high (to avoid escape velocity). The price map (next 5 years, USD) Assumptions the Controllers enforce - Paperization floor: ETFs/custodians/futures absorb flows; self-custody grows slowly. - MoE friction: KYC wallet defaults, tax micro-frictions, merchant rails favor stablecoins. - Volatility clamp: derivatives depth + inventory warehousing + weekend-liquidity "hunts" cap blow-offs. - Don't trigger a bank-run: price suppression is subtle - a rising channel with disciplined ceilings. Year-by-year corridor (spot, end-of-year "most likely" ± range) 1) Year 1: $95k–$150k (modal: $120k). Realized vol ~ 45–55%. Draw-downs −25–35%; spikes fail in low-liquidity windows. 2) Year 2: $110k–$185k (modal: $145k). Vol 40–50%. Two policy/ETF "clarity" squeezes; tops sold into via basis/arbitrage. 3) Year 3: $120k–$210k (modal: $165k). Vol 35–45%. MoE rhetoric cools; stablecoins/CBDC pilots win merchant share. Bitcoin acts like digital gold beta. 4) Year 4: $115k–$230k (modal: $175k). Vol 30–40%. A "shock" dip (−35%) gets rapid policy patch; rebound restores the channel. 5) Year 5: $130k–$260k (modal: $190k). Vol 28–38%. New wrappers (pensions/401k feeders) add grind-up flows; blow-offs still capped. Cycle statistics under containment 1) Up-years: +15–35% (median ~+22%) 2) Down-years: −15–30% (one in 4–5 years) 3) Peak draw-downs: typically −30–40% (vs −70–85% in pre-ETF era) 4) Ceiling discipline: rallies fade into policy events (ETF inflow PR, "regulatory clarity", CBDC pilots). 5) Floor defense: sharp downdrafts arrested by ETF creations/rebalancing/basis trades; price not allowed to linger <~$90–100k for long (to avoid self-custody panic). Why the clamp works 1) Paper share rises -> realized volatility mechanically falls (inventory + option overwrites). 2) Futures/ETF basis control -> suppresses reflexive squeezes. 3) Perimeter frictions (tax, Acceptable Use Policy, KYC wallets) -> keeps MoE niche; "number go up" is paced, not explosive. How to exploit if you are a trader (only spot is covered in this post, not options) 1) Buy fear / sell clarity. - Buy when: weekend liquidation cascades, policy FUD, ETF outflow headlines, net-liquidity drains (TGA rebuild + coupon heavy), and price tags −25–35% from recent highs. - Sell when: "regulatory clarity", index inclusion rumors (e.g. MSTR), big inflow PR, or "institutional adoption" headlines into multi-month resistance. 2) Watch the Paperization Ratio (PR): custodial/ETF/futures share of float. - Paperization Ratio up -> reduce expectation of parabolic rallies. - Paperization Ratio down suddenly (custody scares, PoR memes) -> add to self-custody. 3) Respect weekend micro-structure: - Anticipate stop hunts in thin books. Place stink bids 5–12% below Friday's close; fade Monday reversion. 4) Stay away from levered long ETFs except for intraday events (they decay in capped corridors). - Do not buy and hold Bitcoin leveraged ETFs across months (containment + volatility-crush = decay). Red-flag signals (corridor breaks) 1) Sustained self-custody surge (mempool fee spikes + exchange outflows + wallets trending) while ETF premiums go negative. 2) Hard perimeter tighten (OS/app-store bans for non-KYC wallets, bank de-risking of mining/pools). 3) Major custody incident (hacks, sanctions on a top custodian) -> corridor upside (panic rotation to self-custody) or downside (convertibility doubts). 4) Macro liquidity shock (MOVE > 150 + Net Liquidity −$150B/4w) -> temporary −35–45% draw-down even in containment. What to ignore 1) "Mass adoption tomorrow" MoE narratives (flows will be steered to stablecoins/CBDC). 2) "Bitcoin to $1M in two years" (under current constraints - implausible). 3) Levered products held across months (containment + volatility-crush = decay). The Controllers' optimal Bitcoin path is a rising, volatility-capped channel: roughly $95k -> $190k median over five years, −30–40% max draw-downs, blow-offs sold, floors defended. More context: View quoted note →

Replies (8)

Although I do follow your containment hypothesis as pretty likely, I also think retail demand will be near zero once the prices doesn't blow off sometimes. What will make the price go up when retail lost appetite?
Chris's avatar
Chris 3 months ago
And when the next few trillion of dollars tries convert fiat to BTC? How does the containment plan work then? 🤨 Your assumptions assume everyone is a day trader and long term Bitcoin adoption is near zero…. Just look how well they are controlling gold 🙄 A 10x valued hard asset with looser opaque supply and validation.
You basically didn't read the post and the quoted post or didn't understand them. When are you expecting the next few trillion of dollars to convert to Bitcoin? Make sure to tell them to market buy spot BTC so they can move the price. None of the assumptions assume that everyone is a day trader and long term Bitcoin adoption is near zero. The post literally states that it assumes increased Paperization - custodial/ETF/futures share of float. So you didn't read or understand the post, and you definitely didn't read or understand the quoted post: View quoted note → In regards to your gold comment, you can try to read and understand this post and the quoted post: View quoted note →
Retail demand increasingly matters less and less in a Paperized, Post-ETF environment. Post-ETF: CME futures + ETF creations/redemptions + dealer gamma do the heavy lifting. Now, advisors/RIAs/401k money -> systematic DCA, less forced selling, but more correlation to real yields/tech. If retail wants more volatility, they will chase penny Bitcoin treasury stocks or will lever up in other ways. For retail to matter more, people have to start self-custodying and stop buying paper products (especially ones that don't provide proof of reserves) and I don't see that happening any time soon. View quoted note →
Chris's avatar
Chris 3 months ago
The existing 100x-500x size fiat system is in terminal collapse. 5-8 years at the longest. Maybe shorter. Thats just 2nd derivative math. We hyperinflate into gold and bitcoin (short term) bitcoin only (long term). Paper supply can keep up for a few years, perhaps. But eventually (and unevenly) the (short) dam breaks. For gold it took decades, but it’s finally breaking. (Up 2x and 12 trn in less than 2 years) For bitcoin, I sense, it will be much shorter as it is a far harder/better global money than gold (coming from a former gold bug). Be careful as you trade from the short side. That’s all I’m saying.
So you didn't address any of the arguments in the posts and are coming out with more diversion and wishful thinking logical fallacies. Do you know for how long people have been calling for a hyperinflation type scenario? Maybe it will happen in Nigeria or Zimbabwe, but the US dollar system is about to get reset with stablecoins/CBDCs. Either way, good luck.
Chris's avatar
Chris 3 months ago
It’s a great story….i get the attraction to it. But the math doesn’t net out. Graph global m2 and debt. Now take the same 2nd derivative line forward 5-8 yrs. A few trillion in stablecoins over next 5-8 years doesn’t even cover a tiny fraction of govt borrowing needs. And that’s just marginal NEW debt needed to keep the existing system afloat. Not the mention the hundreds of trillions of EXISTING debt that is a write off. The whole world IS Zimbabwe. Just on a different time scale. All these (CBDC et all) will be tried. No doubt. Govts have to do something! But these just aren’t a big enough boat. And to even try requires massive global co-ordination. Not just US acting alone. Good luck with that 🤣 (I founded and managed a multi billion dollar credit hedge fund in the 2000s, so I’m not talking as a layman. Just for context.) Lastly, the massively deflationary impacts from AI in that same time period make the situation far harder for them to navigating as well. (Read: even HIGHER deficits needed) That’s why I’m so confident on timing. We’ll see! It will be a wild ride either way! 🎥🍿
Chris's avatar
Chris 3 months ago
I’m reminded of Mike Tyson’s famous quip….”Everyone’s got a plan, until they get punched in the face”. A punch in the face is coming. For the entire architecture of central governance globally 😉 Funny story… I walked into many boardrooms to meet with my investors on our “short all things mortgage and subprime” thesis and trade in 2007 and was often rebuffed with “AAA rated banks and fin cos CANT default”. You’re making a big mistake. My response was always the same. Leg go of your reverence for/dogma about these institutions and thier 100 years of history. It’s just MATH. 🤓