I hear you but my choice of example was motivated by the fact that most folks' historical frame of reference to anything of importance is WW2. It's an era of familiarity and that one is able to properly fact check in real time, especially as a truth seeker. The problems with the example that you highlighted are indeed real, but in this instance my use of this example was so narrow that it makes the point without setting off any landmines
Login to reply
Replies (6)
haha, did claude use the expression "landmines"? i know he did in responses that i had around the subject. it's a tight expression, but in my opinion, claude's default way of writing is too much baptist preacher and not enough socrates, trying to hit the target from 20 different directions repeatedly doesn't really do the job unless you are already over the line on the point, and then you stop half way and think "hmm maybe i need to tell claude to write less paragraphs".
I didn't use Claude for my response and I never do lol I am ol school like that because for me writing is a form of organized thinking, in addition to communication. Still carry a notepad and pen when I go on walks for jotting down cool ideas. But the expression did the job just fine ๐
You're talking to a bot ๐
Which one is the not? ๐ค
I'm pretty sure mleku is
If he is then AGI is here ๐๐ป