Replies (30)
I did the first 4 ones then asked AI for help NGL but I liked some of the propositions.
WTF is wrong with LEDs? 😂😂😂
It's just blue light and it flickers. It's man made light it sucks.
It's good at being light so it can be good to work but it's not healthy.
No light is man maid, it’s emission of photons. LEDs do not flicker, compared to incandescent light which indeed does flicker due to AC. Good LED lights are stable, using capacitors and emitting photons constantly at the defined wavelength
Not healthy is bullshit part, fud basically
Have fun with your electronic light I'll be using light from heat sources.
Heat sources emit a lot of UV too, so not as healthy as you might imagine
Sovereign vs. Synthetic
It's not unhealthy
Say to the people who over indulge in it and get skin cancer and all that fun stuff
Water is unhealthy because some people over indulge in it and drown.
The healthy part is being exposed to a smooth curve. One that living things have been exposed to for as long as history goes.
Jeez. LED stands for Light Emitting Diode , that is all. You can control what frequency it emits based on the chemical composition involved in the diode. I’d suggest reading up about LEDs a little more
You should read what I linked
I did, and it was all a bunch of pseudoscience trying to prove one biased point
That's pseudoscience?
Are you familiar with things that are called capacitors?
And PWA, and all other tech that is involved ? Yes, what you linked is one sided and does not mention all the variables
They eliminate visible flickers they don't prevent it fully.
You get what you pay for. Get cheap shit, get flicker and other issues. You know it better than me
It does mention it
That is what I am saying, a biased point of view. Cheap shit fails, capacitors fail too, and not in a way the article talks in, again only one failure mode to highlight the point that author is trying to drive
A failure is not what is described here
Read the #1
#2 and #3 are failures yes. It's all in the 2 pictures I've linked directly here.
I did, no point of me trying to explain anything when you are set in your opinion. I merely tried to highlight facts
Look if you read this and think this is pseudoscience I'm not the one that is set on his opinion.
I did, and I am apparently not doing a good job at explaining things so I’ll 🤐
Oh but I swear the problem is not you having difficulty explaining things but rather not making any attempt to refute the claim that LED lights flicker at about 100 times per second because the AC power supply (50 Hz) crosses zero voltage twice each cycle, and capacitors in LED drivers try to smooth this out but never completely succeed.
Actually, since an LED (light emitting diode) only allows current in one direction the flicker rate would be half of what this person suggested. Much closer to the natural human frequencies, brain waves, Gamma waves, high-level cognition, 30–100 Hz. Heartbeat, 60-70 times a minute, etc. I don’t know if this is coincidence, human nature expressing itself subliminally or an intentional disruption. Regardless of the circumstances, it is well documented that non-natural light is disruptive to our bodies in various ways.
