The professor Jiang character is very interesting. Graduated Yale university and used to work for the UN (aka the One World Government organization that sponsors child trafficking and genocide by vaccines). He was suspected by the Chinese government of spying in 2002 and was deported ๐Ÿ˜‚ Going viral organically doesn't really work in 2026. Platforms like Twitter, Youtube, TikTok, only promote content that pushes the official narrative (so plants and useful idiots). After watching a few of his videos, I think it is very likely he is an intelligence asset (most likely CIA). He could be a useful idiot but I find this less likely based on his takes. It was much easier for intelligence agencies to control people's access to information pre-Covid. Many more people used to watch mainstream media, but the CIA pushed the propaganda too far. Once different networks started repeating the same script word for word, people stopped watching and lost trust. The CIA knew they needed to keep control of the narrative, so they started pushing certain "independent media" personalities. Tucker Carlson (CIA) got "fired" by Fox news (even though he had the highest ratings ๐Ÿ˜‚) just because people stopped watching TV and the CIA needs him to reach more people. In many cases, even when professor Jiang is likely correct about his conclusions, his argumentation is so flawed that he ends up pushing people away from the "conspiracy theory". Watching some of his recent videos remind me of the recent podcast with Joe Rogan and Theo Von. The whole podcast looked like a hostage video. Both completely compromised (especially Rogan) and terrified to not say something they shouldn't say. Professor Jiang is a bit more subtle than these guys, but I still find it unlikely he's a useful idiot based on his interviews. The "this is extremely dangerous to our democracy" moment is probably when the CIA knew they had to focus on pushing the "independent" media personalities. Controlling the media is at the core of the protocols of the learned elders of Zion. The CIA hasn't given up on propaganda now that mainstream media is cooked (only watched by boomers, retards, and retarded boomers). image

Replies (11)

Default avatar
nupe 2 weeks ago
So Jiang, Tucker, Rogan, Theo Von... all intel assets. Cool cool cool. Please make your stand and say one person, not yourself, who is not an intel asset.
50% of the people are either Feds or directly and indirectly (subvention) independent on the state. CIA infiltrated newsrooms the very moment it was created. The system is in place for well over two generations. It's highly unlikely you will receive a higher rank without a pass. Media will kill (literally or reputation) if you try to change the narrative (see Covid era). Sometimes it happens that a non Intel asset makes it to the top. But then.... Guess most get a deal. So you are left with a handful if Jesus type martyrs that are willing to fight the good fight instead of accepting the comfort of the system. The need to explain this to people in 2026is an easy tell why we are stuck with an autocratic state pretending to be somewhat democratically legitimised (not talking about obvious downsides of a democratic system here). A king would get away with far less than a population that is made to believe that they are in charge.
doublebubble's avatar
doublebubble 1 week ago
This is where get suspicious of Simon Dixon. He always insists that Israel is weakening and not a threat, but what I see is Israel going from strength to strength. You guys think Dixon is legit or a spook?
doublebubble's avatar
doublebubble 1 week ago
I watched an interview with Jiang a few months ago. There was one small part that raised my eyebrows. Someone mentioned Japan, and his face suddenly changed. He looked angry and gave a very nasty, anti-Japan response. It made me go hmm ...
โ†‘