1. Jews are not a monolith, and the world is ran in competition by factions of the ruling class, but then as now, elite Jews and their loyalists dominate large swaths of that arena. 2. Hitler exploited the German people, who were already devasted by WWI, to implement racial imperialism. Despite being right about central banks and usury, he was an Antichrist figure. 3. Everybody faked the moon landing. View quoted note →

Replies (20)

Racial Darwinism was extremely popular amongst the political elite across the entire West at that time. Hitler was a student and took the ideas in implementation the furthest. While Hitler gave lip service to the Christian faith, which was common amongst the German people, he was loyal to the old Germanic ways, of pagan naturalism. Hitler was a socialist and an authoritarian who got a couple things right on his descent into hell. image
I think the bigger question is were Zionists in control of Russia, Great Britain, and the U.S. during WWII and Hitler saw the same threat we see playing out today across the West that’s largely been carried out by Zionists in power?
Leaning into this, so Zionists played up the concentration camps genocide (ignoring what Stalin did) and rewrote history to ensure their control for decades to come, so how can you be so sure of what you’ve read about Hitler? And how could Hitler compare on the evil spectrum to Zionists?
Hitler tried to eject Jewry from Germany and was brought to war for it. Jews have certainly exaggerated the Holocaust in order to politically underwrite the last century. Germany certainly interned and killed Jews, probably in mass. Germany is not some special exception: the rule is that governments universally enprison and exterminate. Hitler's view that central banking, predatory lending (usury), and international culture was undermining Germany's heritage and way of life was over target. Hitler also was deeply into eugenics and Racial Darwinism, which was very popular amongst the elite in America (Ford) and elsewhere. The Nazi ideology was based on the old Germanic ways, and Darwin provided "science" to support it. This betrayed the actual German way of life, which was heavily Christian by this time. In this view, both meddling international Jews who had no loyalty to the German people and Hitler were different sort of evils.
apologies for the length of time on this - too many interests - but as I suspected its just not accurate; at all, really. my initial suspicion was that this was certainly far too simplistic and that appears to be the case. "In order to sustain the thesis that Hitler was a Darwinian one would have to ignore all the explicit statements of Hitler rejecting any theory like Darwin’s and draw fanciful implications from vague words, errant phrases, and ambiguous sentences, neglecting altogether more straight-forward, contextual interpretations of such 54 utterances. Only the ideologically blinded would still try to sustain the thesis in the face of the contrary, manifest evidence. Yet, as I suggested at the beginning of this essay, there is an obvious sense in which my own claims must be moot. Even if Hitler could recite the Origin of Species by heart and referred to Darwin as his scientific hero, that would not have the slightest bearing on the validity of Darwinian theory or the moral standing of its author. The only reasonable answer to the question that gives this essay its title is a very loud and unequivocal No!" https://home.uchicago.edu/~rjr6/articles/Was%20Hitler%20a%20Darwinian.pdf
All evidence of holocaust is fabricated. All. Not most, all. Did a Jew die while interned? Sure, but not killed unless you call dying while imprisoned being killed... which is what they call a holocaust. Everything else about mass graves and gas chambers is all lie. The only people who were purposely killed enmasse under similar conditions were white Christians at the hands of Russian jews. What is so terrible about the holohoax Big Lie is that we believed it so thoroughly, that it literally hurts our brains and makes us look over our shoulders to even consider or speak that it never happened.