I’ve had a couple of days to collect my thoughts on the whole Bitcoin Core fiasco. I’ve heard a lot of different perspectives from a lot of respectable bitcoiners, and I’ve learned a lot about Bitcoin in the process.
1) there is obviously demand to put non-monetary data on the Bitcoin blockchain. I think this is generally a waste of block space and provides no benefit to the ecosystem because Bitcoin is a monetary network, not a database.
2) Core’s attempt to push an update that removes a node’s ability to control the transactions that get relayed from their mempool is an overstep of power. It highlights the need for a more decentralized developer community. Nodes should be able to configure their settings however they see fit. Optionality is key. However, nodes already have the option to run any version of Bitcoin Core.
3) if people continue to demand block space for non-monetary data into blocks, we will see more services like Marathon’s Slipstream that allow people to circumvent the filters that people have on their mempools. If these people are willing to pay a higher fee rate than the rest of the network, their data will make it into the blocks regardless of the filters - unless bitcoiners are willing to make a fork that rejects blocks that have arbitrary data in them. I’ve heard that this would be nearly impossible to implement as there would be disagreements about what counts as arbitrary.
4) if this arbitrary data is truly worthless, funding for it will eventually stop, and Bitcoin will return to being used for purely monetary purposes. In the short term, it could be annoying to compete with scammers for block space, but the fees will drop when they run out of money. Trust the incentives.
Overall, putting non-monetary data on Bitcoin’s blockchain is a joke. Core should give nodes as much optionality as possible. Inscription scammers are hard to stop, but they will price themselves out of the fee market as people realize that their arbitrary data is worthless. We should do everything we can to remain in consensus because the Bitcoin community is what makes this whole thing worth talking about in the first place.
nostr:nprofile1qqs8fl79rnpsz5x00xmvkvtd8g2u7ve2k2dr3lkfadyy4v24r4k3s4sppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7c9ljrg nostr:nprofile1qqsr6tj32zrfn7v0pu4aheaytdnnc6rluepq73ndc2tdjzus34gat9qpr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmqpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wcmp77kt nostr:nprofile1qqsggcc8dz9qnmq399n7kp2yu79fazxy3ag8ztpea4y3lu4klgqe46qpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezum3dw35jumt99uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet59up0zady
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Mostly agree with you.
For me the best approach for defense is both limiting space for spam + spam filters together with the financial incentives. As you say Bitcoin is Monetary network, not a multiple purpose decentralized database / shitcoin.
The more friction for spammers, the better.
And I would like to point to the fact that all shitcoins are worthless centralized grabage scam created out of thin air but due the strong propaganda ordinary people are getting brainwashed and are throwing their money into the casino shitcons. So we can not fully rely on incentives.
True. Unfortunately, people will continue to fall for jpeg nft scams on Bitcoin for a long time, which only encourages spammers. The filters are the first line of defense. Another thing that could mitigate spam is home mining by bitcoiners that care more about the long term health of the network than short term profit. I’d like to get into home mining when I get more technically skilled.
Glad we came to an agreement
Me too bro, keep up the good spirit 🤙
We are all together in it and our goals align.
I repeat it often but for me:
#Bitcoin is THE Global Most Secure Decentralized Unconfiscatable Peer-to-Peer Scarce Hard Sovereign Freedom Money and Greatest Store of Value 🧡⚡️🫒
and
#Bitcoin is Hope for Humanity 🧡