Thread

So endorsements like linkedin

define provable skill

Well … I kinda ment “provable” in the sense that a “skill”, “authority”, or “interest” discovered by WoT for a given topic can be “provably” be associated with a particular npub. Centralized “black box” recommendation and discovery algos cannot demonstrate such proof.

Yea but better. Only in Nostr can anyone “prove” the validity of such endorsements … that a “coworker” actually has demonstrated some level of expertise to qualifiably vouch for a coworkers “skill”.

How would one demonstrate their ability for sales on nostr differently than LinkedIn

The UX might be … whatever works best for any one app. But the “proof that this npub’s opinion is valuable to me in this context” will be provided by each individual (and their WoT service provider) … independently of the app that they use. When WoT service providers are able to interoperate across apps to provide such “context aware” rankings, then these “proofs” can be verified by a) tweaking your own algo, b) querying a different provider, or c) checking someone else’s answers.

Ok, so I'm pretty sure I just posted about this recently. I also talked with hzrd about it and basically a new spec would have to be created. Did you have something in mind? BC we basically decided badges and lists aren't sufficient for what is needed

Join the nostr:nprofile1qqstu7l4mcrgc8vy9mf55lp8q5r7e9q0t6j3vuw06p32jh5ap9pq6zspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzvuhsz8thwden5te0dehhxarj9e3xjarrda5kuetj9eek7cmfv9kz7fp79xf #wotathon conference calls to shape the future of WoT specifications (even if you don’t have a project). We’re gonna do this! nostr:nevent1qqsrzdsgezhu6ygvdxwxgsaspxqlat4dt8ddldkyqs0kxgzlfsgxywsp2emhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtmwwp6kyvt2dcehsvmp89mr2mncwpnkxe3hwfnxkdrsdv6r2ur6wp6xuatexfursarvv3mn2urkwpa85mnkv3kkseecwycxvdnwxemq5atfsj