Gave another shot at Linux on a Framework laptop. Man, it's still so bad for non-dev activities. Macs are still king of productivity.

Replies (20)

What activities and what's bad about it? This isn't a leading question from a linux jihadist - I was given a "work Mac", but all my other personal machines are various linux distros on various hardware; I see where the Mac shines and where I want to throw it out a window.
Default avatar
Rand 2 months ago
SIRI/US/ly _wth/_____fFs/***** πŸ™ƒ;.;😁
swagger0808's avatar
swagger0808 2 months ago
Its been a LONG time since I've used a Mac so I have no point of comparison. I do use both windows and Linux (ubuntu mostly) on a regular basis and in general my experience has been that windows is quicker out of the gate (easier to get programs running, services connected, etc. ) but linux has offered far more options and adaptability over the long term.
its good for grandmas who read the news and watch youtube. its not good for photo/video editors, gamers, those who use specialised software etc
just run ubuntu or popos on a thinkpad. I use this as my non-dev machine. what do you need besides a browser? worst case run a sandboxed windows vm on linux.
Good. Guess the post is a bit clickbait. Productivity has a thousand facets. If you can't run your software on Linux, well yes Linux is not for you. If it's about tasks like writing, calendar, making video calls, email and handle your excel sheets. You will get your stuff done. Games are not for productivity btw
What "productivity" activities are there that are "non-dev"? Anything that a normie (non-dev) would ever want to do, I'm quite sure Linux can do it just as well as a MacBook, no? Except gaming, of course, but that sucks on a Mac as well.
100% I’ve come to the same conclusion after 30+ years working with Macs.
I use macs but window managers like hyprland have gotten better than macos. Give Omarchy a try. Its not perfect but it is a quick setup and has a lot of good builtins.
Put hyprland on FreeBSD πŸ€·πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ πŸ˜‚
↑