Replies (50)

Wow! Assuming this was not intentional for some reason, sincere sympathies for whoever made this mistake. If I were an F2Pool member, I would be willing to give up my piece of that fee if requested. I doubt there's an easy way to do that though. Any idea how it may have happened?
Default avatar
nobody 2 years ago
Custodians send bonds and wires that are sometimessent in error too. I used to do it myself and it always freaked me out how little review there was on it before I would move hundreds of millions of $. I did send some bonds to the wrong bank one time but luckily we got it back. There’s no guarantee.
Fees are implicit in the difference between the value of the inputs and the value of the outputs. If you pay out ₿0.075 from a ₿19 UTXO and don't include a change output paying most of it back to yourself, that's a transaction miners are *really* going to want to lock in.
Fees are implicit in the difference between the value of the inputs and the value of the outputs. If you pay out ₿0.075 from a ₿19 UTXO and don't include a change output paying most of it back to yourself, that's a transaction miners are *really* going to want to lock in.
nobody's avatar
nobody 2 years ago
this was an exchange right, at least a highly active person with min 400 #bitcoin left
Yeah it's a steep fee. But I wouldn't mind paying 0.4% when receiving 19BTC, or possibly having it being paid for me by the payer.
Kelevra's avatar
Kelevra 2 years ago
Sex transactions could have happened and we just dont know.....
Akshually, sounds like this was in the mempool before block discovery. Sounds like some very bad software. Everyone hates test-driven development until they wished they didn't.
You're right, and I misunderstood which was the fee and which was the paid amount. Mind blown, in slow motion.
Wen #taproot address + #lightning + #ecash #cashu #fedimints #enuts
In that case the pool wouldn't broadcast the transaction, but only include it in it's own candidate block.