Thread

Filters for coffee = good Filters for chicken noodle soup = bad Two different subject matters

The subject is csam

Filters don’t work. It is what is.

I think csam is a direct object, with the subject being filters.

Possibly. But if so, why would they push filters? Don't they know they don't work? Or do they know they don't work and it is about something else?

What?! 😃 Human speech, Sir, not coding now. Filters on coffee against csam = good Filters in chicken soup against csam = bad ...is the equivalent. The focus is on the on the double standarts.

I'm not talking about code. I'm referring to parts of English (human or otherwise) usage. https://www.perfect-english-grammar.com/subjects-and-objects.html

Alright, I'm no native speaker, so instead of subject I clarify my statement and modify the term to: topic. The topic is csam. To be most precise: the pro-filters argument for both networks is the fight against the spread of csam.

I'm sure I asked about the double standarts of filtering csam on different networks such as chat apps and Bitcoin.

They’re putting csam in coffee now?!? Bastards!

The subject is spam more broadly, ie any unwanted/unsolicited communication to your device. Your messaging app and email provider already have features to prevent strangers from flooding your inbox with garbage. Giving users the ability to abuse the system makes the experience worse for everyone except the spammer.