Everything is buggy at first. I think the nsecbunker flow is the right direction, we just need to keep ironing things out until it's seemless. Very do-able imo

Agreed, which is why we've gone ahead and implemented it (nsecbunker), but the source code for it (the admin interface) is not available, unless am mistaken? Would love to see a UX akin to a lightning payment, where (by clicking a link) my preferred signing app (wallet) will open automatically, then broadcast a signed message on approval

nsec bunker is confusing AF. I've been here 1 year, paid the sats for nsec bunker and it sits like a brick paperweight. I've set up plenty of sites, wallets, etc, but UX for nsec bunker must be for coders, not average peeps with an affinity to explore. zero help available, as well.

When it works, it's a dream. Just approve the kinds in the dashboard, set & forget. Problems can arise if you don't approve in time (signing requests disappear or time out)

none of this makes sense to me, lol.

I totally understand what you mean. I get the same feeling when someone send me a GitHub link. 😅 Like what am I suppose to do with that 🤣

Try Amber. I wish Amber had a "default reject" policy though so I can prevent Amethyst from using it to decrypt things and whatnot.