Sorry, I didn’t mean to come across with attitude, it’s not my intention. I was solely trying to refute the original point.
The article is written by the same people who are trying to convince you that Bitcoin/cryptography is broken.
If you catch my message, I’m saying that Bitcoin disproves their theories and models that they are basing their “computers” on. It’s just an extension of Fiat thinking projected into their desired model of physics and computation.
Bitcoin is the working refutation to any of their claims and models. They have zero proof.
Always be wary of the people who tell you Bitcoin is broken, even it is from our community.
