I cant even guarantee I will even host my videos, let alone others. its equivalent to if everyone would give a dollar. . . . And if you say rent a VPS, we are back to youtube model. My point is that I don't think normal people will pay for this, when youtube offers it for free. Unless they post constantly banned content, youtube will work for most. The problem IMO is that the incentive to store videos is not the same as storring the blockchain, even more it scales 10^N worst than the blockchain storage. The problem is not the tech, is the conext, I think.

Nvm the fact that, if i do this as a youtuber than I will have lets ay 100 even more videos per year, and now I have to host all of them. Bottom line is storage scales exponentially.

I'm with you, a better alternative approach prob exists, but I suppose it's like trusting a bank, email server etc, etc Having other choices in the market is useful, especially if the content creator gets more of the value of their work.