it sounds a little like she did file certain things and they just threw them all out with "what you filed is all nonsense". Of course, I don't know what she filed - and maybe it was all nonsense. But I guess what I'm asking is, if you assume the opposite of your prior statement, that there **is** some secret rulebook and they count on nobody being aware of it, wouldn't throwing out all the filings and in-court comments as "we don't know what those things are" be exactly the move to make to insure that the secret playbook stays secret and doesn't rise to the level of being noticeable by onlookers? I realize there are some logical problems with that line of reasoning, but maybe you'll answer it anyway?

i had a case involving me not registering or insuring a 50cc scooter (sach madass 50) and my legal argument was based on the fact that the Statute of Monopolies 1624 specifically forbids the crown (which means the prosecution) from establishing monopolies, and that their licensure scheme with vehicles - and especially compulsory insurance, was a monopoly. the judge went into chambers for 45 minutes then comes back out and recites about 6 or 7 case histories that had nothing to do with my claims, then gavel goes down and some nonsense about fines that i was not going to pay, and didn't pay. in fact within 6 months i left the country permanently. the real fax are that the whole thing is literally racketeering and that old law should have made it impossible. if i had any money and wasn't doing my own defense and had any access to the documents i probably could have stirred up some trouble because as i pointed out in my argument, the excise duty on the fuel supposedly covers the road use and very reasonably can be said to have a direct relation to the damage one's vehicle does to the road, as well as other reasonable provision for police providing support in cases of car accidents. but the real focus of all of their stuff is not just to pay for it, and when people say equity, if the tax is claimed to be payment for the roads, then what is the registration and how is compulsory payment of insurance to a set of licenced companies - a monopoly, not a literal racket. i lost my bike. that bike was the only way i could get enough advertising around for my tech support business. essentially, the legislation destroys the economic viability of anyone trying to make a living as a freelancer in a field that has no licensure or any of that shit. i was good at my job, i just couldn't get enough customers to actually make a living. anyway. during that time i learned a lot about equity. equity is actually relevant because supposedly there is trust stuff involved in the representation and citizenship stuff. but as i'm sure you are already reaching for your keyboard to tell me, that's not how the system works now. they established their liberal democratic state with representations and congresses and senates and you are already imputed to have a debt of allegiance to the state from the moment you are born (not just the registration). now one other thing i will say is that i've been living a lot of the time in many countries some in the EU some outside of it, almost never getting tax registration. now *that* does have some interesting impacts. it makes some things awkward, but it also means that they certainly are not likely to investigate me for tax fraud at any point even though i clearly can't pay it anyway. which is funny.