Login to reply
Replies (45)
Kennedy proposes to stand up to the deep state and stop the war machine, but will he stand up to his wife? I see no evidence of that.
👀 Fair
I’ve found the reaction to all this very telling. of course he’s wrong about some things because if you have an opinion on *everything*, as you tend to have to when you run for president, of course some of it will be wrong.
the regime is freaking out not because of the output here but the throughput: it’s not that he gets things wrong that they hate, it’s that he thinks for himself. he isn’t captured by borg financial interests. they are gaslighting everybody about the symptoms to try to deflect from the cause.
the real issue he is drawing attention to is whether or not you are allowed to think for yourself in the first place. if you are, it doesn’t matter that he might be wrong - as he would undoubtedly agree and encourage! but if you aren’t, then any narrative dissent must be crushed. and note I didn’t say “falsehood” - what I am pointing to is more like what is now euphemistically called “misinformation”.
to a thinking person, even the concept of “misinformation” as opposed to “falsehood” is offensive. to a regime that takes the concept of misinformation seriously, thinking people are offensive. RFK is appealing to thinking people and, in doing so, showing them that it’s okay to think.
💯
You hit the nail on the head.
Thanks for the link Jack it was a good read.
I like a majority of what RFK Jr says, but he has shared articles about abolishing the 2A and is a big proponent of gun control. He has also said people who deny the established climate narrative should be jailed or even given the death penalty.
This was a good take imo, but I don’t see how the case of Scott Gottlieb moving from FDA to industry roles is «obvious corruption»? Sure, it may have problematic elements, and potential for abuse, but I don’t see how it’s obvious corruption.
Id argue RFK jr is right about vaccine damage reports and invermectin. For those insisting on scientific studies into these things, i find it more telling that the subject itself is purposely avoided or politically funded toeards the opposite conclusion with interesting exclusions. Go to vaccine damage group chats on places like gab ( as facebook and youtube deplatform these groups quickly) and notice how SIDS and speech regression seem to come out of nowhere after ther 18/24 month shots. During the covid hype, we ran an "underground pony paste" operarion at our church and helped hundreds of individuals with symptoms and positive tests get better within less than 10 hours. Stuff like this can't be reported without serious consequences, especially in a tyranical state that loves to punish people for fighting the narrative (wikileaks someone?).
I think it goes without saying that you need to do your own research, but i think its telling of peoples character when they are presented with a potential worldview change, what they decide to do with that information. Go find vaccine damage group chats and soak it up, look at the consistency and correlations, empathize. Stop pretending these people dont exist simply because they challenge the narrative you're smoking.
Regarding Kennedy, his stance on abortion is the unforgivable for me, and thus i couldnt in good conscience support him or anyone else as a candidate.
View quoted note →
What's that mean?
I'm glad he seems to have turned around on the 2nd amendment. His position on Israel is abysmal though, seems to be fully owned by zionist backers.
he is litigating the narrative mess. he is not running for president.
“But Kennedy, too, has used his prominence to unnecessarily scare parents about the safety of vaccinations.
Kennedy’s case for this frightening assertion is that since 1989, two things occurred together: there has been a rise in neurologic and autoimmune diseases; and, we give children more vaccines. In the interviews I have listened to, he doesn’t take the argument much further than this, and I find it to be entirely lacking. It is low-quality causal reasoning, and is unpersuasive.”
This kind of ‘low-quality causal reasoning’ is not the kind of decision making entity we want to drive towards a position of power that is often presented with rapidly developing information or nebulous intelligence reports, where jumping to conclusions based on faulty reasoning can directly impact the lives of millions…
no, he's narratively recalling camelot and invoking the "better days" rhetoric, just repackaged as blue dog fodder. i think rfkjr is an important thinker, and an interesting conversationalist, and would be a fascinating political candidate. his role is to litigate the off-rails narratives of the last 2 decades and appeal to "better angels" - i do not believe he's willingly or seriously running for president.
Hope. #hope #peace #rfk #kennedy #love
One thing is important. If twitter couldn’t stand with the “agenda laws” of the dictatorship does nostr can? You fail me once don’t fail me twice.
Lots of ppl who know nothing want to tell you vaccines don’t cause autism or could even potentially contribute to it. Curious why they are so defensive of it, it ain’t the “vaccine” it’s the toxic metals in the concoction that’s messing everyone up
I doubt that lol but hey I could be wrong
OP is dead wrong on ivermectin/hcq - still a clear victim of propganda. Meta analysis is very clear benefit of both specially in early protocol:
Also many poorly designed studies to discredit them.
In Brazil for example there was a WHO study in the Amazon that was greatly publicized in us msm that told a story it killed.
One closer look would show clearly an overdose protocol (6x the normal) applied to already critical stage patients.
The WHO's main financier is Bill Gates himself.
They killed people just to sideline hcq as a treatment and fast track EUA for the jabs.
Also wrong about autism as well.
c19early: COVID-19 treatment analysis
COVID-19 treatment: real-time analysis of 6,350 studies
COVID-19 treatment: real-time analysis of 6,350 studies for 212 treatments
Wow, he’s running for the Democratic Party, did not know that..
Moving from the underdog fighting the system to the man controlling the system requires a bit of finesse. Can’t really fight the CIA and hope to be anything but a distraction…like him a lot, saving the pumps until I find out his running mate
Why do you like him?
Has libertarian leanings,…strong presidential jawline, physically fit, intellectual speaker
Why do you attest physical attributes to a strong leader?
Are there any other qualities in RFK Jr that you find appealing?
What would deter you from advocating for his candidacy?
In your opinion, what should Americans be looking for in a president?
What are the most important issues?
(In advance: Please answer all the questions to the best of your ability on this particular subject or I'll be forced to act like a child and pull the "I was forced to see your tiny balls, this is the least you can do! 😭" card)
Because I’m human and attraction matters.
Sure, his broad shoulders.
A terrible running mate, like Ron Paul
The issue I care most about is abortion,
NGL my first thought is: well you're not going to be fucking him....
Second thought:
Thank you for your responses. I'm sure that was to the best of your ability.
Could you tell me why you're pro abortion?
And how do you feel about issues in Texas?
Gn
😭😭😭 but you didn't answer the other questions!!!! 💔💔💔
By now everyone should recognize the important role of Vitamin D as preventative for bad outcomes of infection. And yet if you look at the studies Ivermectin has double the prophylactic effect. There is no reason to keep denying its effect, just look at the literature! 
Quick read: Vinay Prasad is a hack.
VP is a well known grifter and a hack. Source? The goodthinkers.
Thanks for sharing @jack. Life is nuanced and I enjoy reading thoughtful takes
There is no fork
😂
Does she know most forks arent ferromagnetic?
😂😂😂😂
Made this related meme yesterday:
