Fascism, communism, socialism, liberalism...
Really anything aside from stewarding the society and resources so as to maximize harmony and prosperity so that future generations will continue to prosper.
The trick is, incentivizing this does sort of rely on dynastic rule of some sort.
What people forget is that 80 years prior to the American revolution, the Dutch effectively took over the UK and undermined monarchy with the establishment of the bank of England. Things had already gone downhill a bit after the Norman invasion, but that really was the final nail.
The revolution wasn't really against monarchy; it happened because monarchy had ceased to be the governing system.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
True, mobs and kings rule the same
And if they're not good at it someone who is is incentivized to fill in the gap, aided by the rebellion who would seek to depose the bad ruler.
I'm not sure an absolute monarch is best, and there is probably cultural variance -- you never step in the same river twice. But the generational incentives make way more sense than election cycles...