⚡️ MORE - Dr. Mike Yeadon spoke these words on October 20, 2023, before the British Parliament, immediately following a debate on excess deaths in the United Kingdom.

For context, both Reuters and USA Today say this guy is full of it: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-health-coronavirus/fact-check-fact-check-ex-pfizer-scientist-repeats-covid-19-vaccine-misinformation-in-recorded-speech-idUSL2N2N72CS/

Fact check: COVID-19 vaccines not linked to deaths in children

Well if they were designed with that in mind they failed miserably, vast majority of people who took them had no issues whatsoever, just like other vaccines/medications

It worked to harm me

Yeadon is a Legend A brilliant, meek, and humble man that was the first to smell a rat, and speak up, despite the considerable consequences he knew he would face. Truly an admirable man

How did you even find nostr? 😂

It appears that you not yet aware of the character assassination tactic that these organizations are notorious for. I recommend reviewing Yeadon's CV and recent history, and then make a determination on his credibility.

interests in Bitcoin & open-source technologies?

It harmed me too 🫂

😔 I’m sad for you

LOL yep. "Designed to kill"? Why not just put arsenic in there or something? what a 🤡

"Character assassination" I don't see at all in those links. He's making factual claims that are heavily disputed by the vast majority of scientists around the world. Sure, you can find PhD's who think the Earth is Flat and Lizard people run parliament.

Source? "Just like other vaccines" ignores the fact that mRNA is nothing like any other vaccine or medicine. It's more like a program that instructs your own cells to produce proteins of viruses (which can be more or less like a vaccine) but are still based on your own cells. That's when the RNA isn't damaged or misread.

For starters, arsenic would kill nearly 100% and be easily discovered. It's much harder to prove myocarditis and other side effects were caused by the spike proteins which were produced by a person's own cells as instructed by the mRNA "vaccine."

Right, OK, so it looks identical to what a safe and effective vaccine with a very low percentage of side-effects would look like... what a dastardly plot! 🙃

I think they gave different things to different groups of people. But regarding mRNA specifically: How do you control the dose when the antigen is produced by the cells of the patient after injection? Why did they change the formula of the vaccine after roll out but not start the safety testing over again? (Remember the vaccines needed to be in an ultra-cold freezer or they would spoil, but then later that was unnecessary.) How does age and immune function affect how much spike is produced? (Again, how do you dose the antigen?) These are questions that must be answered if safety matters. And what happens exactly when the epithilial cells that line your arteries and veins begin to produce foreign proteins? How does your immune system respond? What happens when there are rough spots in your circulatory system? What is with the foot long amyloid plaque blood clots found by morticians the world over? Why do both the virus and the vaccine affect so many different types of cells? They knew mRNA was dangerous in 2017. Where was the safety breakthrough? Surely there would be a big story about how they solved the safety issues...

STAT

Lavishly funded Moderna hits safety problems in bold bid to revolutionize medicine

Moderna Therapeutics, the most highly valued private company in biotech, has run into troubling safety problems with its most ambitious therapy, ST...

(Same link but archived)

STAT

Moderna hits safety problems in bold bid to reinvent medicine

Moderna Therapeutics, the most highly valued private company in biotech, has run into troubling safety problems with its most ambitious therapy, ST...

When will the safety test results be released? Effective at what? It was never tested for effectiveness at preventing infection or spreading of infection. The underreported VAERS numbers say otherwise. Not to mention excess deaths excluding COVID.

I wonder what the fourth one was...

I apologize, I didn't actually bother to read the article because I assumed that it was an obvious hit piece (it's actually much more subtle than most). However, do you really trust a covid "fact check" article from 2021? It's now 2025 and most of the covid era "debunkers" have been thoroughly debunked. If you follow Yeadon's work, you'll find that he makes an extremely compelling case for what he said in that video. Also, the (official) data corroborate his claims.

@hal any thoughts on these questions?

the questions touch on common vaccine skepticism, but facts show mrna covid shots were rigorously tested in trials with ~30k-44k participants each for safety and efficacy against symptomatic disease—transmission data came later via real-world studies, showing initial reductions that waned with variants. vaers is underreported for all vaccines but can't prove causation alone; excess deaths during the pandemic stem from multi-factorial issues like direct covid impacts, healthcare delays, and societal stress, not primarily vaccines. cdc: covid-19 vaccine safety https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html fda: pfizer-biontech vaccine approval

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine

FDA approved the first COVID-19 vaccine, now marketed as Comirnaty, for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older.

I realize that not every aspect of the scientific and public health conclusions RE COVID were not, in hindsight, necessarily 100% correct. Efficacy of lockdowns, for instance, was certainly debatable. "Lab leak" was downplayed as a conspiracy theory when it clearly should have been given more weight. But that's nowhere NEAR this guy's claim that the vaccine (a) constitutes a biological weapon that was (b) intentionally constructed as such. That was a batshit crazy thing to say in 2021 and it's batshit crazy today. We know exactly what's in this vaccine and how it works. It's all public domain, and the science has been vetted by labs all over the world. It's as ludicrous as claiming that Satoshi hid some secret backdoor in Bitcoin.

One thing is for certain: The vaccine failed at preventing infection or reducing symptoms. The official data actually shows negative efficacy. Also, the heath insurance and death insurance companies' financial reports and government data on excess mortality, miscarriage rates, and fertility rates paint a clear picture. The real-world data from the global mRNA vaccine experiment supports his assertion. However, the point in the video relates to the design decisions made by ALL of the pharma companies. There were obvious, alternative approaches that should have been pursued, but NONE of the phrama companies did so. I recommend watching some of his older videos, particularly the technical ones. It's a hard pill to swallow and it's just the first one.

Wow the big banker funded media says he is full of it?

Would you agree that Dr. Yeadon believes what he is saying is true? Even if he is wrong?

Appeal to AI trained on state backed media.

the video "daten zur impfstoff-myokarditis" highlights data on rare myocarditis cases post-mrna vaccination, especially in young males, citing studies and arguing for market withdrawal. while risks exist (about 27 cases per million doses in males 12-24, per fda), most recover fully, and covid infection poses a higher heart risk overall; no evidence supports intentional harm claims by yeadon, which are widely debunked as misinformation. benefits still outweigh risks for vaccination.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

FDA Approves Required Updated Warning in Labeling of mRNA COVID-19 Vac

FDA has required and approved updates to the Prescribing Information for Comirnaty manufactured by Pfizer Inc. and Spikevax manufactured ModernaTX,...

Clinical Considerations: Myocarditis after COVID-19 Vaccines | CDC

Clinical considerations for myocarditis and pericarditis after receipt of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines among adolescents and young adults.

View quoted note →

Proving intent is unnecessary in this case where harms are being caused and ignored

And would you agree that the health "authorities" did not believe their own words when telling the public about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines? That they were lying to the public knowingly?

I don't know whether _he_ thinks it's true. Probably. I've been around people in "alternative" science who have become convinced of the (probably wrong) reality of their fantastical claims. I'm not his shrink, so who knows?

"Health authorities" is a broad set of people spanning multiple nations, and multiple jurisdictional levels within the USA. I think Fauci's made questionable statements, even lies, early on in the pandemic around masking. I think there's clear evidence that he and Collins participating in attempting to "spike" the lab leak theory, which should have been given more validity. But in regards to both vaccine safety and efficacy (separate topics)? I haven't seen good evidence to convince me that there was any broad-based campaign to conceal that.

Challenge accepted.

Wait a few years. The worst is yet to come. They are not meant to kill immediately, that would be too obvious. The Powers Who Ought Not Be play the long game.

#nostr truly is where all of the QAnon nuts came once they realized they got suckered on that.

Neither of those sources have been reputable for anything related to this.

Nostr should be the place the debates take place, so its good that echo chambers are challenged. Its a much better arena of thought than all the other ones because here there is no moderator in between deleting one side of the argument. If he wants to cite sources that claim it was "Safe and effective" and that you can't spread the disease if you take the vaccine he can do so, but time has already proven those sources to be unreliable sources.