Misconception, IMO. English colonists mixed with natives a lot. The early 20th century had a big wave of immigration from all over Europe, which altered the demographics here at least as much as the previous 400 years of settling and mixing. But since that's not taught, people think the natives just got wiped out, and that's not right.

Not nearly as much as the Spanish did

I mean, in the Americas. I just noticed Belgium there... Yeah that one is right.

Depends on the time period and specific place. The main reason the Latin American countries received fewer European immigrants is because they mismanaged their economy so bad. Nobody immigrants so they can be poor

the portuguese mixed a lot with the natives. btw, the jesuits were doing a great job bringing the european culture to brazil. unfortunately, the freemasons took control of portugal and started dismantling what good have been done in centuries. the luso world would have been great if it was not for the "enlightened luciferian freemason" sabotage. sadly, we live in this masonic-designed world, today.

The number of Indigenous people killed by the Portuguese was equal to, or even fewer than, that of the Spanish, as there was no more developed Indigenous civilization to oppose them more strongly. Therefore, the reason why there are not as many Indigenous people in Brazil as in Spanish countries is that there was a lot of European immigration and, in many cases, much more rapid miscegenation. Although there are entire states where the population is more likely to adopt the Indigenous phenotype.

I guess I am Spanish.