Everyone does not watch porn, and porn is bad. Same for Drake and vaccines.
I’m trying to be polite and have a real discussion here but it’s pretty intellectually dishonest to say that Christianity is equivalent to porn, drake, and vaccines.
You can assess the goodness of something for yourself based on its history and its teachings. And you can even criticize the history of the Church while still acknowledging how culturally influential it was.
It’s hugely arrogant and stupid to assume everyone for two thousand years was just part of some “bandwagon fallacy”.
Replies (2)
They would kill you for not believing that Jesus was magic.
Jesus was just a guy.
The Romans needed a reason to worship him so that their leaders could use it to manipulate them, so they made him magic.
But he was just a guy.
They copied half the mythology from what they knew about other religions.
Anyone can find enlightenment or become a spiritual teacher if they devote their life to it.
Doesn't require virgin birth or any other miracles to achieve.
You’re putting words in my mouth. Didn’t say they were equivalent. I used those as an example of the bandwagon fallacy. Your argument was that Christianity is good because Jesus was so impactful. I’m arguing that other things are more impactful than Jesus.
More people watch porn than worship Jesus. So porn is more impactful than Jesus but that doesn’t mean it’s good.
In other words, how impactful something is does not mean it is good or right. Your argument is wrong.
