It seems like it should be easier to get buy in to anarchist groups since they are naturally single purposes. Somehow we still get this obsession with single mega groups that cover every opinion like it actually makes sense that my opinions on fiscal policy and gays must be aligned.

Replies (1)

Both of humanity's two main interaction domains: meat space and networked society; are bad at facilitating hyper-contextual relationships. on traditional social media, you either FOLLOW or UNFOLLOW or MUTE or REPORT, wholesale, treating the other user as a monolith. In meat space you have to share borders and physical resources and while it's currently a little more generous wrt interacting with people contextually and not as monoliths, it's still bad, relative to the possibility space. SCWoT - Subjective, Contextual WoT - (currently in the earliest of days on nostr with GrapeRank) is the first viable shot we have at exploring the alternative. Like I've said hundreds of times, I very seriously think it's our best chance at survival as a species, if we want to be free. I need to be able to loathe 99% of a person, but love 1% of him and do mutually-beneficial business and computing with him within that 1%. Bitcoin: money for enemies Nostr: protocols for enemies SCWoT: society for enemies