b10c's avatar
b10c b10c@b10c.me 1 year ago
Looking at the merkle branches that mining pools send to miners as part of stratum jobs, it's clear that the BTCcom pool, Binance pool, Poolin, EMCD, Rawpool, and possibly Braiins* have exactly the same template and custom transaction prioritization as AntPool. image Stratum v1 jobs include (parts of) the coinbase transaction and the merkle branches a miner needs to compute the merkle root. If all branches are equal across pools, the block template is exactly the same. This is a smaller merkle-tree with the stratum job branches highlighted. image Here, branch0 is the txid of the first transaction in the block after the coinbase. In the AntPool/Binance/BTCcom/.. template, it's a manually prioritized transaction paying 9.03 sat/vbyte
The Mempool Open Source Project®
Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with The Mempool Open Source Project®. See the real-time status of your transactions, get network info, and more.
 Many of the other pools didn't prioritize a transaction and included the highest feerate transaction
The Mempool Open Source Project®
Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with The Mempool Open Source Project®. See the real-time status of your transactions, get network info, and more.
 paying 301 sat/vbyte. ViaBTC prioritized another transaction and has a vastly different template. This indicates that F2Pool currently is not using the AntPool templates, even if they share the the same custody provider. We know from multiple occasions that F2Pool has been building their own templates (https://b10c.me/o11, https://b10c.me/o9, https://b10c.me/o8) Note that SigmaPool and SecPool both seem to share the same template (distinct from AntPools template). Two names, but probably one pool. Some overlap in the first branches of distinct pools is expected as these branches consist of few (usually high feerate) transactions. For example, Ocean's "default" and "core" templates overlap up to branch3. At least the first 15 tx (2⁴ - 1) in the template are equal. * similar to EMCD in the picture, Braiins sometimes differs from AntPool in the later branches of the template. This could indicate they're only helping with AntPools transaction accelerator and directly syncing with AntPools mempool, causing occasional differences in templates. I've heard speculation about this all being liked to an FPPS partnership with AntPool/Bitmain. Bitmain insures against bad pool luck but you have to use Bitmains templates/transaction prioritization and pay the mining reward to the insurer for later distribution. Essentially a pool of pools and a lot of mining centralization.

Replies (9)

Default avatar
npub1hklp...3u2k 1 year ago
Can this be automated into a website? How difficult would that be?
OT's avatar
OT 1 year ago
I wonder if the people and companies mining with these pools know about this.
Default avatar
₿itcoin 1 year ago
How can we verify it is you? There is no nostr account presented on your site.
Uxellodunum's avatar
Uxellodunum uxellodunum@proxymana.net 1 year ago
It proves they own or have some control over the domain, and hence the website. The NIP-05 ID is linked (and actually resides on a nostr.json file) on a webserver reachable via that domain - Thus you have th beginning of a chain of verifiability. But the verification ability goes further than that. https://b10c.me/.well-known/nostr.json?name=b10c - This is the link on their profile. You can get they're pubkey in hex format from here. npubs are usually read in the NIP-19 bech32 format, so if you take that that hex string and convert it into the NIP-19 bech32 format (many nostr pub key converters around) you'll get the npub address that's displayed on their nostr profile.
2 replies ↓
Default avatar
npub1r03d...2qfw 1 year ago
Him...
b10c's avatar b10c
Looking at the merkle branches that mining pools send to miners as part of stratum jobs, it's clear that the BTCcom pool, Binance pool, Poolin, EMCD, Rawpool, and possibly Braiins* have exactly the same template and custom transaction prioritization as AntPool. image Stratum v1 jobs include (parts of) the coinbase transaction and the merkle branches a miner needs to compute the merkle root. If all branches are equal across pools, the block template is exactly the same. This is a smaller merkle-tree with the stratum job branches highlighted. image Here, branch0 is the txid of the first transaction in the block after the coinbase. In the AntPool/Binance/BTCcom/.. template, it's a manually prioritized transaction paying 9.03 sat/vbyte
The Mempool Open Source Project®
Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with The Mempool Open Source Project®. See the real-time status of your transactions, get network info, and more.
 Many of the other pools didn't prioritize a transaction and included the highest feerate transaction
The Mempool Open Source Project®
Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with The Mempool Open Source Project®. See the real-time status of your transactions, get network info, and more.
 paying 301 sat/vbyte. ViaBTC prioritized another transaction and has a vastly different template. This indicates that F2Pool currently is not using the AntPool templates, even if they share the the same custody provider. We know from multiple occasions that F2Pool has been building their own templates (https://b10c.me/o11, https://b10c.me/o9, https://b10c.me/o8) Note that SigmaPool and SecPool both seem to share the same template (distinct from AntPools template). Two names, but probably one pool. Some overlap in the first branches of distinct pools is expected as these branches consist of few (usually high feerate) transactions. For example, Ocean's "default" and "core" templates overlap up to branch3. At least the first 15 tx (2⁴ - 1) in the template are equal. * similar to EMCD in the picture, Braiins sometimes differs from AntPool in the later branches of the template. This could indicate they're only helping with AntPools transaction accelerator and directly syncing with AntPools mempool, causing occasional differences in templates. I've heard speculation about this all being liked to an FPPS partnership with AntPool/Bitmain. Bitmain insures against bad pool luck but you have to use Bitmains templates/transaction prioritization and pay the mining reward to the insurer for later distribution. Essentially a pool of pools and a lot of mining centralization.
View quoted note →
↑