The world has literally gone crazy. How is that different than saying
"Car manufacturers can be held responsible for criminal activity when criminals use their cars to commit crimes and cannot be stopped or identified"
"Book publishers can be held responsible for criminal activity when criminals use information from their books to commit crimes and cannot be stopped or identified."
"Camera manufacturers can be held responsible for criminal activity when criminals use their cameras to surveil and plan illegal activities and cannot be stopped or identified."
Login to reply
Replies (12)
Gov should be help responsible for criminal activity when fiat money is involved
I don't think there's any difference, but I'm not a lawyer.
The world has literally gone crazy. How is that different than saying
"Car manufacturers can be held responsible for criminal activity when criminals use their cars to commit crimes and cannot be stopped or identified"
"Book publishers can be held responsible for criminal activity when criminals use information from their books to commit crimes and cannot be stopped or identified."
"Camera manufacturers can be held responsible for criminal activity when criminals use their cameras to surveil and plan illegal activities and cannot be stopped or identified."
View quoted note →
Yup. It's pretty crazy.
In other news: Blacksmith sentenced to 48 months jail; his knife was used to stab someone. This follows the incarceration of an automobile manufacturer, as one of his cars was used for a bank heist. 
View quoted note →

Because it’s different when it affects and hurts THE BANKING CARTEL.
You know … The Federal Reserve and the US Federal Government ought to be found guilty of money forgery and aiding and abetting of forgery. This is only possible in a convention of states, however.
The system is fundamentally flawed such that forgery is a necessary part of it.
This is true
imagine tcp/ip devs are now responsible for ALL online crimes🤣
I think the unspoken idea here is that privacy itself is seen as a crime. Cars have legitimate uses, but in their minds you have no right to evade financial surveillance.
Never seen cars being distributed free though :-) or Cameras or even physical books - soft books yes but you cant throw them on anyone to cause a hurt :-) Free porn was always under eyes and is in many jurisdictions - but it got lax now for there are bigger issues of money ..
Please don't tempt the courts and lawmakers to take stances like these, they just might do it, unironically.
They are wrong though, because that's 4th amendment unreasonable search and seizure. They are violating the law of the land. They are illegitimate.