Replies (37)

Default avatar
npub1xh50...mpys 1 year ago
this is kinda dangerous, is it not? It seems like a few devs a pushing changes to the core software without the wider public knowing about until the changes have been merged in
2 replies ↓
Matt's avatar
Matt matt@gitcitadel.com 1 year ago
I can't wait to finish school and start developing Bitcoin. I want to be the @ODELL of developers. No more bullshit.
OT's avatar
OT 1 year ago
Is this blown out a bit? Can't people that have similar interests meet and talk or create together? Once they submit the next release anyone can see all the changes to core
Uxellodunum's avatar
Uxellodunum uxellodunum@proxymana.net 1 year ago
It's not about what is more centralised or not, it's about what presents the most favourable conditions to achieve strong decentralisation. Nostr presents a a much more favourable environment and and stronger incentives to achieve a much higher degree of decentralisation than StackerNews. One is built for it. The other isn't.
1 replies ↓
Default avatar
Rand 1 year ago
shine the light/ transparency!
Lloyd Dunne's avatar
Lloyd Dunne lloyddunne@getalby.com 1 year ago
This is what makes me paranoid of the covenants talk. It is made to seem that talk has arisen naturally, when it could easily have been schemed behind close doors. John Carvalho is right when it comes to how cautious we should be in changing bitcoin, and not running the latest version of core until absolute certain
bc21's avatar
bc21 1 year ago
Stay humble, stack zaps
↑