This is true from the Builder Bro perspective. I don't see why great projects will need to adopt LLM tools, since they were already great before the existence of LLMs. If some LLM project shadows those great projects, fine, but I don't think it can kill them. LLM usage will destroy collaboration and push out a lot of people who actually enjoy problem solving with programming, which seems to be really difficult to understand for the Builder Bro. No one wants to hear that actual smart programmers don't want to collaborate with LLM abusers and definitely don't want to waste time reviewing their generated code. Code quality alone has been a factor of gatekeeping for a long time and this won't change. View quoted note →

@ODELL I inquired into OpenSats and a few Bitcoin-only companies, but was ultimately rejected based on my location. I'm not a "builder bro" (family time is my main priority) and only want to work on meaningful FOSS for a very humble amount of sats. Do you have any guidance for me?

@Иван Ты не знаешь почему не давно (недели 2-3), на этом релей, другие кайнды появились, именно не на русском языке? Когда я филтирую чтобы только ноты kind 1 показываются, и теперь всё как и было.

@Vlad, Bitcoin Takeover Podcast your interviews with Eric Voskuil saved me from the filter drama

@Jumble hey, clicking on an emoji that someone already reacted with under a note doesn't seem to work anymore (on mobile at least). It just highlights the emoji and then doesn't actually send the reaction event for me

I'm starting to categorize everyone in the recent #bitcoin drama into the following groups: 1. devs bankrolled by a company that has ulterior motives 2. podcasters sponsored by a company that has ulterior motives 3. fanatics that are on the bandwagon of 1 or 2 Did I miss any?