We’re live! View quoted note →

#wotathon community call in one hour!! View quoted note →

GM all good people!☕️🌞🫂 View quoted note →

👀 View quoted note →

The WoT Sandbox by @vinney...axkl at

Decentralized Lists

is very cool. The Decentralized Lists NIP and the Trusted Lists NIP are each implemented and functioning! 😃 This includes support for replaceable 39998 and 39999 events in addition to 9998 and 9999 events. You can make your own lists, other people can add to them, anyone can upvote/downvote, and synthesize them into Trusted Lists! I’ve been using it to create the basic relationship types necessary to incorporate the next NIP into the sandbox: Graphical Organization of Decentralized List Items. This will allow us to organize Decentralized Lists into complex structures like this one for the list of dogs. Very exciting! 🔥

GM all good people! ☕️ 🌞 #wotathon community call in a little over half an hour! View quoted note →

#wotathon community call tomorrow! View quoted note →

GM nostr! Merry Christmas to all!🎄

Check out this awesome Freedom Tech swag I got from @Scott ••• !!!

Custom NIP: Decentralized Organization of items on a DList (decentralized list) using a directed acyclic graph.

NostrHub

NostrHub | Discover and Publish NIPs

Explore official NIPs and publish your own custom NIPs on NostrHub.

Whenever someone points out that follows does not equal trust, reach for this article. TL/dr: For any question of interest, WoT should use any and every piece of data that is available and relevant to the question at hand. Should we use follows? Yes. Should we use explicit, unambiguous "trust" events? Yes. It's not either-or; it's both-and. View article →