DireMunchkin

Great rip between nostr:nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcp2amhxue69uhkv6tvw3jhytnwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0dec82c33wv6hjufkwaskgamj0pjx2drvdpn8xdfkvahrvdrgwaa826rwvesnvu3ed44rgdekwg6hxdrgdd6ku7n80fchyuekwymh5qpqs5yq6wadwrxde4lhfs56gn64hwzuhnfa6r9mj476r5s4hkunzgzqjx5gu2, nostr:nprofile1qyx8wumn8ghj7cnjvghxjmcpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqqgxwm2uphepw737mmejn7ja84vj6cw4r9n7zkeewurufcra03qh38cspy780 and nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7cnjvghxjme0qyt8wumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcqyzjng4zlj86pn3l3g734hc993m2lfv565md45ns782gg9jqddz7ujs4h79k! Covering all kinds of interesting topics from miniscript to insurance. https://youtu.be/7YJgAzowml8 Question: If I understand this sequence correctly the money becomes spendable by Anchorwatch and Coincorner *before* reverting to unilateral self custody? If so I really don't like this. I mean there's nothing technically stopping Anchorwatch from just refusing to co-sign any withdrawals and then rugging the vault after 335 days. Is there any reasons why the last two steps couldn't happen in reverse order? I.E as the policy has expired you can then withdraw unilaterally. If you still don't move the money yourself or collaborate to roll it over to a new timelock, only then can Anchorwatch move it I.E for inheritance or to recover from loss of all 3 keys. If I misunderstood something feel free to correct me.

I have successfully convinced my parents and sibling to buy some BTC 🫡

Yo nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wsqzp382htsmu08k277ps40wqhnfm60st89h5pvjyutghq9cjasuh38q7t6dtc , any plans to bring Strike to Switzerland? Given you guys went to the Eurozone and Lichtenstein already. All the local Bitcoin only exchanges here suck, plz help 🙏

Excellent piece by nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqgkwaehxw309a5kucn00qhxz7n6v9kk7tnwv46qqgx73pgqr7k842c6yxne8v2nc2xacknef2qcld8mna0d38pnxqhhmqt9ge4r. Remember even stacking sats runs into diminishing returns eventually! https://firebtc.substack.com/p/the-stacking-sprint

Hey nostr:nprofile1qqs9vmqkduad4vxglwja5q2mpvauer4nd9452he2r4pml0vhqktyd2qpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujucm0d9hx7uewd9hj7aqfmp9, I'm noticing CoinOS UI on Zapstore is not matching the hash, can you have a look?

Mandibles https://ground.news/article/rice-prices-double-in-japan-as-inflation-accelerates

S/O to OP_DAILY https://bitcoinpark.substack.com/, this is a really good short daily newsletter

PSA - nostr:nprofile1qqsgajr2e8ssj7vesefqdrhxkqpz8w8ryed2hvl79rakkwmw999de9shuz8h5 has a web of trust filter on comments, use that instead if reply spam is bothering you.

My take on BIP-177 is that setting aside what display unit you want to use, this is just not belong as a BIP. All the other BIPs deal with consensus or cryptography, I.E backend stuff you need to coordinate over. I.E silent payments, fork signalling, seed phrases and so on. There are no BIPs for UI/UX standards, because you don't need to coordinate that. If you want to show the wallet balance in dollars, bits, sats or whole Bitcoin you can just go do it. There's no need to coordinate that. Hell, you can even make it a configurable setting in the wallet. Also for that reason it's seems like tilting at windmills to try to define a "official" unit via BIP. We don't have a official UI/UX convention. I question the need to define such a thing, and if we did it wouldn't belong in BIPs anyway for the aforementioned reasons.