A new demo video thanks to a vibe coded video editing Pipeline:
https://npub1xj4hakl5evf6yhd9ppuejw5fkn02gjzc6r3wx3m3mjddzcc4jggsgtffr8.nsite.lol/english.html
c03rad0r
npub1c03r...yrnw
Your local ISP
What's the best nip60 wallet?
#asknostr
There are no free #Linux kernel drivers for contemporary Wi-Fi hardware. Tell Qualcomm, Inc. to release fully-free drivers for its in-production Wi-Fi chipsets, just as it\'s predecessor, Atheros, did sixteen years ago:
Home | Tell Qualcomm: Publish Free Drivers for Modern Wi-Fi Chipsets!
#SovEng FOMO
#TollGate finally runs on a Rapsberry Pi 4b+ now thanks to @Joel 🇨🇭 !
This is such a powerful addition to the list of supported devices. Node operators who's hard drives became too small or who gave up on passive income via lightning routing can now run a TollGate.
Thanks for your service! 🙏
@sandwich , @hzrd149 , @florian , @Lez nsyte has become incredibly easy to use - especially compared to half a SEC-03.
@npub15qyd...yejr I am firmly convinced that ngit is unstoppable now that there are nostr enabled git servers.
Thanks for all the work you guys have clearly put in!
Recently I learned she interesting things about routing.
We have been thinking about how nostr could play a role in messages propagating through a fully natted network without requiringamn authority like IANA to structure the address space.
We considered using nostr relays as a tool to reduce chattyness in such a network - will elaborate more in a dedicated writeup. Apparently networking people have considered similar approaches and [they would describe](https://yggdrasil-network.github.io/2019/01/09/history.html) the nostr relay as a "super node" in this context.
Also, related: apparently greedy routing is very efficient and it can be done effectively when devices know what their GPS coordinates are - aka "geographic routing".
If they don't known their GPS coordinates, they can do quite a lot with synthetic data. This synthetic data stuff is an area of research. While promising, it still has limitations.
Further information regarding synthetic data:
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1015471
I might need slides to for a 10 minute explanation of nostr for a technical/networking audience shortly.
Does anyone have some good visualizations of TIP-01 that I can use?
#asknostr
I'm looking for a good voice changer. What voice changer did you use in this podcast @Avi Burra ?
View quoted note →
Fountain
The Acceleration • Episode 4: Healthcare Hacks And Prog‑Rock Tracks • Listen on Fountain
SummaryIn this episode of The Acceleration, host Avi Burra sits down with “Dr. Neural MD,” an anonymous engineer who builds AI systems in healt...
Gitworkshop just keeps getting better every time I look away. Thanks for adding the (perhaps controversial) delete feature @npub15qyd...yejr
Flash memory cells don't keep working forever. The more times each cell is written to, the more it degrades. Wikipedia states that typical memory sticks are only designed to have each cell written to a few thousand times before the degradation causes data corruption.
Most devices use a technique called "wear levelling" that attempts to spread writes around the memory. That means you're not constantly hammering the same cells and causing them to fail when the rest of the memory is still fresh. Because of wear levelling, a USB flash drive should last until the amount of data that has been written to it is approximately a few thousand times its capacity. For example, a gigabyte drive should be able to cope with a few terabytes of data being written to it, over its lifetime.
I'm not sure what you mean by "full erasing" but I guess it means either overwriting all the data on the card or overwriting the entire card. That has just the same effect as writing the same amount of data, in terms of memory wear. So, for example, writing a megabyte of data and then overwriting it all should have roughly the same effect, in the long term, as just writing two megabytes of data. Reformatting the flash drive should have roughly the same effect as completely filling the card with data.
So, long story short, if every time you write data to the drive, you eventually delete it by overwriting, that should roughly halve the life of the drive (as compared to a standard operating system delete, which just marks the areas of the card as unused, without overwriting the data stored there). Maybe you care about that; maybe you don't. It would have been good for a few thousand uses; now you can "only" use it a couple of thousand times.
If you delete by reformatting, the drive will wear faster: if you fill the drive to x-percent, then reformat, you're writing as much data as you would if you filled it to (100+x)-percent. If you just deleted the data, you'd be able to use the drive a few thousand times 100/x times; reformatting means you only get to use it a few thousand times 100/(100+x) times. The life of the card is reduced by a factor of (100+x)/x. For example, by a factor of three if you only half-filled it, and by a factor of 11 if you were only 10%-filling it.
Super User
Can frequent erasing of USB flash drives cause damage?
I have been told that frequently 'full erasing' memory sticks can damage them. Is this true? I work in a situation where the same sticks are re-us...