Man I love this shit, this is the same stuff they kept calling other countries authoritarian dictatorships for... Zero principles, 100% supremacists View quoted note →

By the way if you propose a soft fork to help clients validate Bitcoin without the full state (stateless clients) you will be called a shitcoinr attacking Bitcoin... So do whatever you want guys, as long as fees are low, let it rip. View quoted note →

The problem with this all out war is that you have to be a magician to recover when you lose. But seeing how he handled Mamdani's win, he is a fuckin magician not going to lie. View quoted note →

Genocidal scum #what_the_jews_did View quoted note →

Sidechains are the only scalable way to do this by the way. View quoted note →

If you want something to waste some time with click random and let me know if you find any particularly badname https://gist.githack.com/Nuhvi/8daa04620118a00d5d6bf40c3fbd9c6f/raw/bfec269dc84471abc6160cf36822cf9aca9c757f/mns-visualize.html

Rootstock transactions cannot be faked either, unless you are a miner and even then you will lose 90% of the fees to the reward sharing smart contract (future miners). View quoted note →

I am trying to convince everyone that we already have progressive opt-in covenants, initially through a federated multisig, but possibly with a majority of the hash rate if they are interested in taking over the covenant or at least enforcing its validity on top of the federation. And I am trying to convince people that this can be done without any externalities on non-consenting parties, and that we can do all of this without the social scalability struggles of consensus level soft forks. I plan to send this to the mailing list, but I would rather be told that I am an idiot here before I send it to bitcoin Devs

Gist

overt-explicit-upgradable-covenants.md

GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.