๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ whoever loves Digit's avatar
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ whoever loves Digit
npub1wamv...u3l2
Digit is Digit. I love her. I knew her online from wallstreetbets and she disappeared while going through some shit. I keep needing proof she's safe. To anyone I've ever treated unfairly, I apologize.
#monero all time high seems like dollarbrain fake news. I can't find any all time charts for Monero in real money, but I'm pretty sure the chart spike 7 years ago would still be red against both gold and silver, so it's not even half an all time high. Just a meaningless "dollar value" high
Actually, I just double checked, and it looks like doggie coin has had its first 5 year losses against stocks for a long time. Not any other money I know of, but a lot of stocks. Doggie coin has "lost most of its value" against the top performing stock of that time period: APLD. Stocks aren't exactly money the way doggie coin or silver are, so it feels like a weird comparison to say doggie coin "lost value against it" when really it's more like the stock gained value measured in doggie coin. Anyway, I can't find an actual chart of doggie's value in shares of APLD, so it's possible doggie coin has had 5 year loss periods for a long time without actual red charts. Just because it's waiting for someone to draw a chart with a red crayon. If nobody actually finds or makes a DOGE / APLD chart, the first red 5 year chart for doggie coin could still end up being against Monero, just because it's easy to find a 5 year DOGE / XMR chart in color on various websites. And Monero is actual money, so that could also be the first time doggie coin actually loses value against another money over 5 years, where that doesn't feel like a misplaced comparison at all to me. View quoted note โ†’
It seems like, if doggie coin gets its first red 5 year chart around now, it would likely be against Monero or some stock I'm not thinking of. Not Bitcoin or even silver.
image I've waited almost 5 years to find out if doggie coin will get its first red 5 year chart from that spike back then. It seemed like too big of a spike, possibly done by price manipulators to hold doggie coin back in the long run. Short term gains, long term losses by using an overinflated chart spike to later create red 5 year charts. That would almost completely ruin the coin's meme appeal, and then it could either decay forever, or suddenly surprise everyone again like it usually does when it seems all hope is lost. I'm not sure which is better: being such a strong meme that it just spikes again to keep its dominance for now, OR temporarily losing its dominance but then getting it back to prove it's not just a ponzi scheme that runs on momentum. Obviously keeping its dominance for now is more convenient for me, but the other way might be better in the long run. The only bad option is going into permanent decay, obviously.
4K would have been called 4X if the goal was "marketing" rather than anti-intellectual gaslighting. They say idiots are more likely to buy TVs that say 4K because 2160p is too long and complicated to understand, but 4X is just as short and easy to understand without being dishonest, misleading, or factually incorrect at all. So IF dumb customers skip purchases on "2160p" then the options are: * 2160p - keep all smart "4X" customers, but subtract some dumb ones * 4K - keep all dumb "4X" customers, but subtract some smart ones (I'll never buy one of these TVs) * 4X - Keep dumb customers and smart customers This is all pointless speculation anyway since we have zero evidence "2160p is too long and complicated for customers to understand" is true to begin with. It's easy to logically verify they're lying about it being a reason to gaslight people, so there's no reason to assume they're not also lying about it being a thing to begin with. Either way, just a reminder corporations don't care about money, they care about control.
A few things to understand: * Republican and Democrat figureheads are friends * They like each other and want to help each other succeed * They seem to want to die and take everything with them because their book says they get rewarded in valhalla or something * Their voters are less devoted but still overall on board with dying and taking everything with them * Since voters are less devoted than figureheads, they get upset about the actual process of dying and taking everything with them * When they get upset, they say mean words about whatever figurehead is in power * When Biden was in power, he punished voters for mean words they said about his friend Trump * While Trump is in power, he punishes the voters for mean words they said about his friend Biden * When the next Democrat figurehead is in power, they will punish voters for mean words about their friend Trump again
โ†‘