halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney
halalmoney@stacker.news
npub1vdaz...7rjz
Freedom. Justice. #Bitcoin https://stacker.news/r/halalmoney
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 6 months ago
NGU is the only signal that will get people's attention. People are dumb. They are distracted. They are ignorant. They are lazy. Their one weird friend getting rich will be a wake up call. If you think people are suddenly gonna wake up to Austrian economics or sovereignty or any of the many other things that attracted most of us you are delusional.
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 6 months ago
“What the apparatus says and does are also two different things, Microsoft and Musk... arguably two of the most important defense contractors, are the standard bearers of closed source models. From a natsec/competitiveness perspective, what they ultimately care about is who can produce the chips (to power weapons), energy to power the chips and manufacturing (of weapons), and data-warehouses from which to glean intel (on how to best use weapons). Having AI processing/data domestically also means SIGINT, packets going over Cisco equipment and US-laid submarine cables, not Huawei's. Bitcoin is a good analogy here, it's a digital thing like a model that's only as secure as the flow of energy, chips, and communications networks in the real world... all things that fall under the direct control of the natsec apparatus.”
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 6 months ago
"…bitcoiners usually don’t understand hard money, even if they’re sitting on it." "…if you're counting on nation-states or treasury firms to pave the way, you're deluding yourself completely.) Ultimately, Bitcoin could "win" in fiat valuation while utterly failing its revolutionary promise. Let that sink in again: ”Bitcoin can lose, while its fiat price goes up.” (avb_21)" "…the revolution won't hodl itself." Source: The Bitcoin Standard obituary, on why the book that brought so many into bitcoin, actually turns them away Alles Voor Bitcoin Jul 28
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 6 months ago
Social mobility will become progressively locked as AI progresses. What is at risk is not simply job loss, but the very idea of income distribution. In recent history, the interdependence of social classes implied a convergence of interests. Valuable skills commanded a premium in the marketplace, which would lead to social mobility. Things have changed; the concept of valuable skills is vanishing in real time. AI-driven production systems are becoming increasingly self-sufficient, which will diminish the income flows redistributed across society. Productivity gains will come from improvements in AI, not from the upskilling of workers or human ingenuity. Wealth will be passed down within closed networks, with little need for outsiders. In this highly probable scenario, income distribution as we know it will cease to make sense. This problem is even more concerning than job automation. AI will kill social mobility | Matthieu Téhénan | The Critic Magazine
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 6 months ago
“imagine a mature mesh network where every packet is cached and forwarded peer-to-peer. imagine the line between mobile devices and nostr relays begins to blur.” View quoted note →
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 6 months ago
“In the short term, the basic arithmetic of bond markets has deteriorated; more supply coupled with a reduction in both reliable and speculative demand. And that means higher bond yields look probable, forcing governments to pay more to fund their ever-growing deficits. The maths of governing developed countries looks likely to get increasingly difficult.”
halalmoney's avatar
halalmoney 6 months ago
“Until recently, technological assistance in self-correction was mostly limited to plagiarism detectors. But things are changing. Machine-learning services such as ImageTwin and Proofig now scan millions of figures for signs of duplication, manipulation and AI generation. Natural language processing tools flag “tortured phrases” – the telltale word salads of paper mills. Bibliometric dashboards such as one by Semantic Scholar trace whether papers are cited in support or contradiction.”