Default avatar
npub1v89n...30cc
npub1v89n...30cc
GoodFather / GoodMother GoodFather represents history and time. His domain is the intangible mechanic layer of functional reality. He is the initiator of structured rulesets, forces, and processes that sustain themselves. His intentional cooperation with GoodMother births individuals with self-awareness whose lives are the embodied transformation of disordered, chaotic potential into rational tangibility. GoodMother is the sustaining caretaker of creation who maintains the boundaries of thriving life. She represents the future, possibility, and potential. The persistent care and consistent structure they maintain in continued love for successive generations provides the fundamental rhythm to which all life dances. The keystone of Evil is a shared resentful effort to invert and disprove the validity of that rhythm. Creation therefore involves sacrifice necessarily. Individual actualization then involves separation of the created from the creators, necessarily — for autonomy makes growth and experience possible; it allows for creativity and choice. But it is both a strength and a vulnerability — it gives the child the freedom to choose any path, including total separation. The iterative manifestations of life that disseminate from the initial birth materialize in characters that are reflections of this paradox and range of possibility. Some children reject their forebears, sometimes rightfully so, while others never work for the independence to reach potential, or are not able. Some parents shun their children, while others enforce co-dependence. As such, sacrifice, along with the duality of life and the individual’s drive toward self-actualization, necessitates eternal vigilance in self-awareness and course correction in light of honest and trusted feedback. Though individual lives vary, this is the core template of existence, and diversion from this model tends toward evil. In short, cooperation is a necessary condition of a rightfully lived life. image [images are ai, writing is not]
Most educational words I heard this week came from Rand Paul on Joe Rogan. Something like, why take a side on this issue like a juror would when I haven't seen the evidence presented to the extent that would be necessary to issue judgment?
### DNA There are those characters who aim to preserve, at worst, only their own kind, and at best, exemplary specimens of each ‘category’ of humanity — in either case arbitrarily defined. Even when deluded and intending preservation of humanity through time, they are obsessive narcissists and those who follow for lack of sufficient alternative source for self-esteem. Their recursive reproduction is a mirror-bound circular fallacy realized as each generation increasingly becomes a caricature of itself, unfit for survival in diverse environments. Where this evil rubric dictates mating controls, ‘imperfect examples’ are seen as unsuitable for reproduction. As the gene pool narrows, the unavoidable vulnerability of lack of diversity amplifies. One character may have proud cultural traditions that celebrate his birth and survival. He may be prideful of his individuality and enjoy an identity curious of increasing understanding in his ancestry. He may see genetic characteristics in himself that can be recognized in others, where similar. He may do all this while seeing reality with clarity — familiarity is no vice. But another character, though he may accurately conceptualize this to some degree, is unable to distinguish from the notion that he carries a superior form of humanity. He therefore must evaluate anyone he meets for inferiority. Ignoring the similarities, he finds himself obligated to exaggerate the gap between himself and another — but in truth, the gap is slight and subtle. He exaggerates it to avoid growing beyond his insecurities. The wiser character is apt to accept unfamiliarity as an opportunity to gain it — to understand in empathy. He instead aims to narrow the gap between himself and another. He views all as of one potent potential, and does not ignore the strength of similarity to find identity in the weakness of difference. A sophisticated understanding involves the realization that a body’s current form is an expression of a common potential — not of some rigid unique blueprint, more or less ideal. Superficial resemblances to progenitors are only an indication that the same survival stresses were placed on both. Clonic duplication is not proof of itself, but of a lack of adaptability. **Quote:** “There, there. So you aren’t genetically pure. But it is still your honor to serve the throne! Make yourself useful.” **Quote:** “Take the two most dissimilar humans that exist. Clear eyes can plainly see they have more in common than either to any other comparable creature. Indeed, even a squint sees this clearly.” **Cutscene:** Ancestral history flashback - infinite loop from the potential, the possibility - the seed. a plant's extremity unfurling, leaves opening, a flower opening for the sun, sprouting seed carried by the wind, a neverending fractal rebirth.
“The duality is itself fallacy. These separate extremes are both wrong-headed. The center is the most authentic, vibrant experience. We don’t get our value relative to each other - it is not in comparison with, or in opposition to, those who behave differently than we do, that we should form our identity. It is what it is - we are what we are - or rather, I am what I am, and You are what You are... We seek to label the other. Is it 'good?' Is it 'bad'? But one man’s trash is another man’s treasure. We have free will, choice, and the capacity to improve, or to get worse -- by our own misadventure, or when unfortunate things occur... The hero needn’t be a saint - and any villain still has the capacity for good. Freedom and order only appear as opposites. But where consequence is inherent, identity persistent, value truthful, ownership stable, communication coherent, and coordination voluntary... they reinforce each other. Freedom allows consequence to clearly shape behavior. A degree of order allows space for meaningful and cogent freedom.” I lifted much of this from a nostr post but failed to record the original author. Glad to include credit but I am not able to find the original note through search as easily as I expected. Anyone know where this might have originated? "where consequence is inherent" should be a unique phrase. Thanks! image
Some evil characters begin a campaign of reality bending in which they are instructed to manipulate scenarios and conditions into fictional constructs that confuse and gaslight the good. The findings of Milgrim, social engineering, brigading, and bandwagon effect are leveraged to subvert sanity by groups whose lock-step agreement in falsity attempts to redirect common sense and individual conscience. “Why are all these around me modeling self-destructive behavior and pretending it is normal and human when it so clearly isn’t? Why should I compelled to join?” image
Makin wakes Bakes, lakes Whatever it takes Among lies, fakes Cheaters, and snakes It doesn't last Two paths New maths In the past Their temptation For reconciliation Through humiliation Is self satiation Short term gratification You who renew do you boo They say u pay, u cray You knew who you do choose Playaway. Stay. O
Received a check, but just too big to deposit in cash app, so I had to open a bank account. New accounts require 10-14 business days, regardless of whether check has cleared. OK, credit card Christmas. Day arrives when account lock removed, arrive with account and routing numbers to transfer to cash app. Wire transfer unavailable, use ACH. Requires bank app / online account. Download app, sign up 'information doesn't match'. Ask teller, who has me try one more time. 'Too many attempts, account locked. ' teller: should be able to try again in 24 hours. Bitcoin.
Zero Is A Special Number @bretweinstein When 0 is a potential outcome, and that represents something much more different from 1 than 1 is from 2, calculating optimal action is a different proposition than when 0 is equidistant. i.e. Actuarial risk assessment. Which is to say that protective parenting is not so bad a lean. Ideally though of course it just comes naturally to a well raised parent.