Been messing around with #ChatGPT. Just wrote my first working swift script wicht uses the @mempool API to check for new blocks and displays the block height, hash, number of transactions and which pool mined it. Took a while to figure out how #ChadGPT (😉) “thinks” and how to ask for coding stuff the right way but I am amazed at what it can do. Mind you I never wrote a single line of swift code in my life before. 😅 To bad ChatGPT doesn’t know about Nostr yet. Otherwise I would have made this in to a Nostr 🤖.

It’s that time again #zapathon ⚡️

What’s this about Fiatjaf? @fiatjaf

Looking forward to the #zapathon tonight. ⚡️

Platforms should be used as tools, not weapons. #nostr.

I am and will stay an Apple device user, that’s my choice. The nice thing is that each can make it’s own choice. Kudos @Derek Ross for helping those who choose Android 👍. View quoted note →

🤯 simple & easy 👍 View quoted note →

😩 can’t delete hastily posted notes.

@jb55 and of #damus using #nostr I decided to dive in to Apples App Store Review Guidelines. The following bullets related to in-app purchases (Chapter 3.1.1) makes me thing there should be a creative solution to fix this. Just spitballing but this is my Curren train of thought, without technological barriers. Bullet 2; Apps may use in-app purchase currencies to enable customers to “tip” the developer or digital content providers in the app. Idea - Buy sats via in-app purchases. Pro - Keep on zapping ⚡️ Con - 15-30% premium on your sats 🤬 Bullet 3; Any credits or in-game currencies purchased via in-app purchase may not expire, and you should make sure you have a restore mechanism for any restorable in-app purchases. Idea - Make sats refundable doesn’t say it has to go trough the App. Could make just go to your own wallet. Pro - Easy? Con - Not certain if that’s allowed Bullet 4; Apps may enable gifting of items that are eligible for in-app purchase to others. Such gifts may only be refunded to the original purchaser and may not be exchanged. Idea - This could be te way you send each other Zaps. Zaps would be gifted items someone bought trough in-app purchases. Pro - Keep on Zapping Con - Iteration issues and again 15-30% premium on your sats 🤬 Bullet 5; Apps distributed via the Mac App Store may host plug-ins or extensions that are enabled with mechanisms other than the App Store. Idea - Blank on this but maybe someone else has an idea Pro - ? Con - ? Bullet 6; Apps offering “loot boxes” or other mechanisms that provide randomized virtual items for purchase must disclose the odds of receiving each type of item to customers prior to purchase. Idea - Also no idea on this but maybe someone else does Pro - ? Con - ? The complete document:

Apple Developer

App Review Guidelines - Apple Developer

The App Review Guidelines provide guidance and examples across a range of development topics, including user interface design, functionality, conte...

#damusgate

@jb55 and of #damus using #nostr I decided to dive in to Apples App Store Review Guidelines. The following bullets related to in-app purchases (Chapter 3.1.1) makes me thing there should be a creative solution to fix this. Just spitballing but this is my Current train of thought, without technological barriers. Bullet 2; Apps may use in-app purchase currencies to enable customers to “tip” the developer or digital content providers in the app. Idea - Buy sats via in-app purchases. Pro - Keep on zapping ⚡️ Con - 15-30% premium on your sats 🤬 Bullet 3; Any credits or in-game currencies purchased via in-app purchase may not expire, and you should make sure you have a restore mechanism for any restorable in-app purchases. Idea - Make sats refundable doesn’t say it has to go trough the App. Could make just go to your own wallet. Pro - Easy? Con - Not certain if that’s allowed Bullet 4; Apps may enable gifting of items that are eligible for in-app purchase to others. Such gifts may only be refunded to the original purchaser and may not be exchanged. Idea - This could be te way you send each other Zaps. Zaps would be gifted items someone bought trough in-app purchases. Pro - Keep on Zapping Con - Iteration issues and again 15-30% premium on your sats 🤬 Bullet 5; Apps distributed via the Mac App Store may host plug-ins or extensions that are enabled with mechanisms other than the App Store. Idea - Blank on this but maybe someone else has an idea Pro - ? Con - ? Bullet 6; Apps offering “loot boxes” or other mechanisms that provide randomized virtual items for purchase must disclose the odds of receiving each type of item to customers prior to purchase. Idea - Also no idea on this but maybe someone else does Pro - ? Con - ? The complete document:

Apple Developer

App Review Guidelines - Apple Developer

The App Review Guidelines provide guidance and examples across a range of development topics, including user interface design, functionality, conte...

#damusgate

I love Apple but this sucks big time. Is there a way to bypass this? Maybe buy Zaps/Sats trough in-app purchases. (Pre-payed Zaps). Would turn the App Store in a to a Bitcoin exchange 😂. This would allow @jb55 to make some money as well. Maybe powered by a non custodial exchange (bisq?) in the background? Don’t know exactly how that would work but this might be something to explore. View quoted note →

One more before bedtime. Just for the zap ⚡️ of it. #zapathon

Is the #zapathon still on? ⚡️⚡️

Enjoying tasty burritos in the garden. #foodstr