Also architectural criticism is *good*. if they get enough pressure that its not decentralized enough then they may dedicate more time to that. If they go down the centralized path due to demands from early users who prefer censorship then it would be a huge waste of time for everyone. We already know how that plays out.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Exactly. If it becomes decentralized only in name and is based around a central node it’s just Twitter with a less ergonomic protocol. It’s much harder to go back afterwards and make it decentralized than it is to do that from the beginning.