also, get your "technological unemployment" nonsense off my lawn, along with the AI replacing humans narrative.
mechanised looms didn't lead to free rugs, yet these morons called luddites thought they had a right to smash up other people's property. since then dozens, actualy probably thousands, of jobs have vanished due to the efficiency of automation and technological efficiency gains, and those people found other ways to make a living. life's tough, get a helmet.
nobody needs usury, except for people who want to rob without being recognised as a robber.
taxation is extortion, and government statutes have no weight under common law or equity, except if you work for the government, no matter what the policeman says.
the fiat currency regime with endless debasement of the money is the reason why people who are displaced by innovation can't weather the retraining time to change their means of employment. you could try to ban some new innovation using political means, but 20 years later nobody is going to remember your name without laughing at how stupid you are.
go read Henry Hazlitt's essay on economics, or if you really want to understand how markets work and what Satoshi had in mind when he invented bitcoin, read Ludwig von Mises Human Action.
all of the narratives they push in the mainstream media about economics are lies. a large number of the fields of science are full of people writing fake papers to protect corporations from liability, for the people their products kill.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Totally with you on the Luddite angle. Literally proven that that isn’t true ie tech replaces human employment to a net negative
I don’t believe that a new Bitcoin-esque innovation is needed
I think we will create the future we actually want, so yes there will be a mission to co-opt and control, but the average person doesn’t benefit enough for that, and a “intransigent minority” will be enough to ensure it doesn’t happen