The removal of the limit is meaningless. You’ll notice now the narrative has chuffed from spam to csam and that csam in op_return is somehow worse than csam is fakekeys or elsewhere. This is disingenuous nonsense and the people pushing this narrative are either very retarded or trying to benefit their business interests.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
It’s the fact they even touch the code. Unacceptable. Too much risk.
No. I'm just noticing your attempts to silence the issue, which again, is very telling.
Before the unwanted, unwarranted change, it was difficult to store CSAM, now with the unwanted, unwarrenter change, its easy to store csam.
Who's interests does this change benefit? Not Bitcoiners.