Like I said - there are actual sources which can be cited (which you're doing here), which will relate to specific models and specific testing protocols (as you've pointed out). I don't disagree with any of that. What I was taking issue with, and explained really clearly in the post of mine you quoted, was your insinuation that the the paper booklet is current ("nobody reads these", present tense) and that the red-highlighted text appears verbatim today in those booklets. That is just an entirely different (misleading, outrage-trolling, etc.) claim and message than your accurate citations in this post.