Might make sense for some people. Still, there will never be a single stack that has it all. I only chimed in because I watch these debates as they cross my feed and I'm always left wondering what the aim is. Like we have Bitcoin. We have Monero. Some people use one, the other, both, or neither. I just wonder what the point is of having Bitcoin if you just want to turn it into something else with different tradeoffs that already exists anyway (Monero). Same for the people who think Monero should be Bitcoin. The two separate things exist because neither of them can have every element in one package (as far as I can tell anyway). So what's the goal? Like I'm not mad that Ford isn't Toyota. I just don't buy Ford or whatever. I love Toyota but I also love my Nissan truck so I use that too. I'm curious what your aim is. Do you want Bitcoin to become Monero? Do you want people to just not use it at all and switch to Monero? Do you just like arguing? Educating? What should I take away as a spectator?

Replies (2)

I have these conversations so that the people who are lurking learn about the topic. also because I want to move the overton window in the Bitcoin space away from NGU and towards private self-soverin usage. I don't think there's any realistic possibility it will implement substantial change. mostly I just dislike tribal affiliation and discussions that aren't fact-based.