i get where you're coming from, but there are some big tech things that are very hard or outright impossible to replicate in a decentralised protocol like nostr. your concerns about churn and not listening to feedback is valid, but from a dev perspective there is always a long list of things to do and hard problems to solve. nostr is understaffed and underfunded.

Replies (1)

ty. I may have not communicated it properly but my note does not suggest to replicate the big tech. otherwise, why move to nostr? I am not sure if you have seen the back and forth thread from the last 48 hrs about nostr's client and relay security coming from the relay operator and devs themselves. nostr is under funded and under staff is general knowledge. but I don't think we need to compromise secuirty and basic functionality. users only asked basic things: notifications, filtering and searchability. ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿซ‚
โ†‘