There's truth in what you are writing. For the way forward, have you heard of projects that are concerned with these very issues of Bitcoin privacy, global scalability, and creating an economy based on Bitcoin? One of them is called 'BitcoinOS' which is to become a protocol for rollups on BTC main chain. The other is called 'Sovryn' which tried its hand on creating non-KYC finance on Rootstock L2 which is merge-mining with BTC main chain. If you are as concerned and interested in the subject as it seems from your text, it may at least be worth checking out if these guys there are up to something.

Replies (1)

I am not up to date with more recent efforts, and I have an intuition grounded in years of experience that tells me the lack of privacy and anonymity in L1 is going to negatively impact Bitcoin's use as freedom tech even when other layers do possess those properties. Having said that, I applaud, support and commend any and all efforts to make Bitcoin more private and anonymous. I save in Bitcoin, as long as I have trustless a way in and out from whatever it is that I can spend privately with (Monero and Lightning at the moment), I am happy. I am also fairly sure that this is not going to be solved with just tech. Many here eschew politics, I don't like it myself, but the fact is, our opponents organize against us using politics as a weapon, with the backing of the violence of the State once their surveillance becomes law. Perhaps at some point the right answer is for us to organize politically and internationally as well. Or things will probably just keep sliding into tyranny.
โ†‘