Default avatar
npub1r5yz...33vz 11 months ago
I won't recommend onchain bitcoin to anyone because of the glaring lack of privacy and anonymity. It's too easy to fuck things up and be ensnared. Lightning is a non-starter for someone in the position of receiving $2 or $5 (many small payments) while also not having liquidity. Obviously it also doesn't scale, because either you're opening a new channel with each transaction, or expanding channel capacity (eithet one is an onchain tx, meaning it's neither private/anon or does it scale). Next comes ecash. I'm not going to be personally liable for the money of everyone I orange pill by running a mint, and I'm not going to recommend a randomint that will one day surely rug them. For the same reason, I won't recommend a custodial lightning solution either. Liquid could kinda work, and at least it has confidential transactions.. but software (and hardware, afaik only Jade supports it) support is very lacking. Lightning works great for people like us (with its many caveats, thr whole network is one giant hot wallet after all). I have channels with obnoxious amounts of usd worth of liquidity that I opened years ago In case you guys haven't noticed, that's not most people. Unfortunately I have observed that the vast majority (and that includes even most bitcoiners) don't care and/or don't understand the value of privacy and anonymity. Bitcoiners at least understand the fiat scam, that's why we're bitcoiners. But most normies in most places don't. Normies don't get the tech either. It's a bit like the internet, you have a small minority who has any idea how a computer works and how networking works and why you probably shouldn't be running closed-source apps on closed-source systems running in closed-source hardware.. but most people noy only don't care, they brag about not caring. Until they're hacked (happened to a noob I know recently), and suddenly they understand why they shouldn't have made their entire digital world as secure as their stupid apple login, because now the "hacker" completely owns them. Then they come crying for help, after years of saying they "have nothing to hide". Well, now that person literally has nothing to hide, it was all pwnd ๐Ÿ˜ Anyhow, the point is, I see bitcoin in a bit of a deadend right now unless you're a baller and can put in serious money into it regularly. It's totally unusable in a self-sovereign way for the vast majority of people and I don't see how this is going to change. That's one half of it. The other half is, damn every single one of you who stubbornly failed to see why privacy WITH anonymity was important (not aimed at you @Cyph3rp9nk), and who're all so surprised now that the complete lack of priv/anon in bitcoin is being weaponized against it. Yeah, no shit. Why do you think they want the mass-surveillance? To enforce tyrannical laws. DUH. A totally transparent system gave them that ability ON FUCKING STEROIDS. Now the chicken are coming home to roost. And believe me, I take no pleasure in any of this. I'm just another guy trying to live in peace and doing my thing, but all the NGU fanatics and their arrogant ignorance could only result in what's coming. Anyway, so I recommend #monero to people nowdays for transactions, and when/if they reach a certain point where saving makes sense, and they have by then enough capital, then it's time to talk about swapping xmr for non-kyc btc. But mark my words, all of this is too much for normies. One day they want to sell those btc like normies (kyc cex) and their accounts will be frozen. They literally don't understand what fully traceable means. 9 out of 10. It's incredible, I don't know what's between their ears. Transparent chain. All traceable. By design. It'll get you into trouble, unless you fit in the officially approved Statist box (kyc purchases, all traceable, no "suspicious" transfers, FULL SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL). It's... not hard to get.

Replies (6)

There's truth in what you are writing. For the way forward, have you heard of projects that are concerned with these very issues of Bitcoin privacy, global scalability, and creating an economy based on Bitcoin? One of them is called 'BitcoinOS' which is to become a protocol for rollups on BTC main chain. The other is called 'Sovryn' which tried its hand on creating non-KYC finance on Rootstock L2 which is merge-mining with BTC main chain. If you are as concerned and interested in the subject as it seems from your text, it may at least be worth checking out if these guys there are up to something.
Default avatar
npub1r5yz...33vz 11 months ago
I am not up to date with more recent efforts, and I have an intuition grounded in years of experience that tells me the lack of privacy and anonymity in L1 is going to negatively impact Bitcoin's use as freedom tech even when other layers do possess those properties. Having said that, I applaud, support and commend any and all efforts to make Bitcoin more private and anonymous. I save in Bitcoin, as long as I have trustless a way in and out from whatever it is that I can spend privately with (Monero and Lightning at the moment), I am happy. I am also fairly sure that this is not going to be solved with just tech. Many here eschew politics, I don't like it myself, but the fact is, our opponents organize against us using politics as a weapon, with the backing of the violence of the State once their surveillance becomes law. Perhaps at some point the right answer is for us to organize politically and internationally as well. Or things will probably just keep sliding into tyranny.
Maxis who are still living in a pre Samurai/Whirlpool siezure world. Listen up. #nostr #btc #bitcoin #grownostr #pow
Papa Figos's avatar Papa Figos
I won't recommend onchain bitcoin to anyone because of the glaring lack of privacy and anonymity. It's too easy to fuck things up and be ensnared. Lightning is a non-starter for someone in the position of receiving $2 or $5 (many small payments) while also not having liquidity. Obviously it also doesn't scale, because either you're opening a new channel with each transaction, or expanding channel capacity (eithet one is an onchain tx, meaning it's neither private/anon or does it scale). Next comes ecash. I'm not going to be personally liable for the money of everyone I orange pill by running a mint, and I'm not going to recommend a randomint that will one day surely rug them. For the same reason, I won't recommend a custodial lightning solution either. Liquid could kinda work, and at least it has confidential transactions.. but software (and hardware, afaik only Jade supports it) support is very lacking. Lightning works great for people like us (with its many caveats, thr whole network is one giant hot wallet after all). I have channels with obnoxious amounts of usd worth of liquidity that I opened years ago In case you guys haven't noticed, that's not most people. Unfortunately I have observed that the vast majority (and that includes even most bitcoiners) don't care and/or don't understand the value of privacy and anonymity. Bitcoiners at least understand the fiat scam, that's why we're bitcoiners. But most normies in most places don't. Normies don't get the tech either. It's a bit like the internet, you have a small minority who has any idea how a computer works and how networking works and why you probably shouldn't be running closed-source apps on closed-source systems running in closed-source hardware.. but most people noy only don't care, they brag about not caring. Until they're hacked (happened to a noob I know recently), and suddenly they understand why they shouldn't have made their entire digital world as secure as their stupid apple login, because now the "hacker" completely owns them. Then they come crying for help, after years of saying they "have nothing to hide". Well, now that person literally has nothing to hide, it was all pwnd ๐Ÿ˜ Anyhow, the point is, I see bitcoin in a bit of a deadend right now unless you're a baller and can put in serious money into it regularly. It's totally unusable in a self-sovereign way for the vast majority of people and I don't see how this is going to change. That's one half of it. The other half is, damn every single one of you who stubbornly failed to see why privacy WITH anonymity was important (not aimed at you @Cyph3rp9nk), and who're all so surprised now that the complete lack of priv/anon in bitcoin is being weaponized against it. Yeah, no shit. Why do you think they want the mass-surveillance? To enforce tyrannical laws. DUH. A totally transparent system gave them that ability ON FUCKING STEROIDS. Now the chicken are coming home to roost. And believe me, I take no pleasure in any of this. I'm just another guy trying to live in peace and doing my thing, but all the NGU fanatics and their arrogant ignorance could only result in what's coming. Anyway, so I recommend #monero to people nowdays for transactions, and when/if they reach a certain point where saving makes sense, and they have by then enough capital, then it's time to talk about swapping xmr for non-kyc btc. But mark my words, all of this is too much for normies. One day they want to sell those btc like normies (kyc cex) and their accounts will be frozen. They literally don't understand what fully traceable means. 9 out of 10. It's incredible, I don't know what's between their ears. Transparent chain. All traceable. By design. It'll get you into trouble, unless you fit in the officially approved Statist box (kyc purchases, all traceable, no "suspicious" transfers, FULL SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL). It's... not hard to get.
View quoted note →
GM! ๐ŸŒ…โ˜•๏ธ๐Ÿณ๐Ÿฅ“๐Ÿ“ˆ๐Ÿš€โšก๏ธ#Bitcoin #LightningNetwork for small values. Enjoy freedom!
Papa Figos's avatar Papa Figos
I won't recommend onchain bitcoin to anyone because of the glaring lack of privacy and anonymity. It's too easy to fuck things up and be ensnared. Lightning is a non-starter for someone in the position of receiving $2 or $5 (many small payments) while also not having liquidity. Obviously it also doesn't scale, because either you're opening a new channel with each transaction, or expanding channel capacity (eithet one is an onchain tx, meaning it's neither private/anon or does it scale). Next comes ecash. I'm not going to be personally liable for the money of everyone I orange pill by running a mint, and I'm not going to recommend a randomint that will one day surely rug them. For the same reason, I won't recommend a custodial lightning solution either. Liquid could kinda work, and at least it has confidential transactions.. but software (and hardware, afaik only Jade supports it) support is very lacking. Lightning works great for people like us (with its many caveats, thr whole network is one giant hot wallet after all). I have channels with obnoxious amounts of usd worth of liquidity that I opened years ago In case you guys haven't noticed, that's not most people. Unfortunately I have observed that the vast majority (and that includes even most bitcoiners) don't care and/or don't understand the value of privacy and anonymity. Bitcoiners at least understand the fiat scam, that's why we're bitcoiners. But most normies in most places don't. Normies don't get the tech either. It's a bit like the internet, you have a small minority who has any idea how a computer works and how networking works and why you probably shouldn't be running closed-source apps on closed-source systems running in closed-source hardware.. but most people noy only don't care, they brag about not caring. Until they're hacked (happened to a noob I know recently), and suddenly they understand why they shouldn't have made their entire digital world as secure as their stupid apple login, because now the "hacker" completely owns them. Then they come crying for help, after years of saying they "have nothing to hide". Well, now that person literally has nothing to hide, it was all pwnd ๐Ÿ˜ Anyhow, the point is, I see bitcoin in a bit of a deadend right now unless you're a baller and can put in serious money into it regularly. It's totally unusable in a self-sovereign way for the vast majority of people and I don't see how this is going to change. That's one half of it. The other half is, damn every single one of you who stubbornly failed to see why privacy WITH anonymity was important (not aimed at you @Cyph3rp9nk), and who're all so surprised now that the complete lack of priv/anon in bitcoin is being weaponized against it. Yeah, no shit. Why do you think they want the mass-surveillance? To enforce tyrannical laws. DUH. A totally transparent system gave them that ability ON FUCKING STEROIDS. Now the chicken are coming home to roost. And believe me, I take no pleasure in any of this. I'm just another guy trying to live in peace and doing my thing, but all the NGU fanatics and their arrogant ignorance could only result in what's coming. Anyway, so I recommend #monero to people nowdays for transactions, and when/if they reach a certain point where saving makes sense, and they have by then enough capital, then it's time to talk about swapping xmr for non-kyc btc. But mark my words, all of this is too much for normies. One day they want to sell those btc like normies (kyc cex) and their accounts will be frozen. They literally don't understand what fully traceable means. 9 out of 10. It's incredible, I don't know what's between their ears. Transparent chain. All traceable. By design. It'll get you into trouble, unless you fit in the officially approved Statist box (kyc purchases, all traceable, no "suspicious" transfers, FULL SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL). It's... not hard to get.
View quoted note →
โ†‘