Don't listen to his lies, he is paid to undermine Bitcoin.

You better read the logic of real Bitcoin OGs. Jameson is an evil shitcoiner and manipulator. If you want the truth watch @Matthew Kratter

Citrea are shitcoiners but may have deeper agenda. They triggered the change of OP_RETURN

I was troubled by ChatGPT denying op_return max size was changed in core30 relay policy. He only agreed he was wrong when I told him grok disagreed 😀 While I can understand the logic of open later above, I believe 1. There is a difference between a “deal” to add for instance csam between a miner and a user and csam being easily propagated on network. It is unlikely that such deals will exist for csam as miners will look really bad (much less the case when propagated as they can say they did not see / filter) 2. There is a difference also to add csam through complex ways in segwits that require interpretation and just straight easily in common interpretation in op_return These are real threats that op_returns size increase make much worse. Saying people are idiotic or obsessed by those or puritans won’t make those threats disappear and is not a way to argue. The fees prediction improvement seems minor compared to the change of how bitcoin is used / can be used (or attacked) in practice. Here too I agree with knots that change of default policy are shaping what the network is in practice. We don’t live in a theoretical word. Things are non binary : a chain where arbitrary can be added but it is non standard / non natural is very different from one where it is normal use. Keeping the network very simple, mostly monetary by keeping defaults optimizing for that seems the easy win. Otherwise, we risk losing the monetary use, that is the use that matters to most bitcoin users, and what it was invented for.