Blocked by nostr:npub12rv5lskctqxxs2c8rf2zlzc7xx3qpvzs3w4etgemauy9thegr43sf485vg on X, so will post here…
Over 1/5 of the network is running knots. Choosing not to do so will result in an inefficient mempool.
Calle, if you don’t mind unblocking me, I don’t think I made any personal attacks.
Or perhaps I’m blocked for simply being low IQ.
Replies (4)
There is no reason to join a coordinated attack on bitcoin simply because it has managed to capture a 20% share of the network. That’s an absurd take, IMHO.
I don’t view knots as an attack, basically reject your premise.
In fact, most people on the “other side” of the issue are asking to leave things the same and hold on the release of v30
Is it not an attack when the loudest proponents of it have resorted to calling Core developers and users enablers of illicit material and threatening them with the specter of legal action and government intervention? The whole thing reeks of zealotry and cult behavior. You can run whatever you want, but there’s no logic to support the argument that anyone else should feel compelled to do it just because it exists.
1) The loudest proponents don’t represent the entire movement.
2) Show me where a core developer was threatened with legal action? I did see a case made that the change could invite legal action, but that is much different.
3) I don’t think I’m in a cult, but maybe
4) I agree, run whatever you want
